Dirac equations: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This equation essentially reads | This equation essentially reads | ||
<center> | <center><math>D_A y = - y </math></center> | ||
<center><math>\Box A + \nabla (\nabla_{x,t} A)= \underline{y} y </math></center> | |||
where y is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and | where <math>y</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and <math>D</math> is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>A</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>. | ||
* Scaling is (s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1). | * Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>. | ||
* When n=1, there is GWP for small smooth data [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]] | * When <math>n=1</math>, there is GWP for small smooth data [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]] | ||
* When n=3 there is LWP for (s_1, s_2) = (1, 1) in the Coulomb gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1999|Bou1999]], and for (s_1, s_2) = (1/2+, 1+) in the Lorentz gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]] | * When <math>n=3</math> there is LWP for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1, 1)</math> in the Coulomb gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1999|Bou1999]], and for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1/2+, 1+)</math> in the Lorentz gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]] | ||
** For (s_1, s_2) = (1,2) in the Coulomb gauge this is in [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]] | ** For <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1,2)</math> in the Coulomb gauge this is in [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]] | ||
** This has recently been improved by Selberg to (1/4+, 1). Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. A) is kept fixed. | ** This has recently been improved by Selberg to <math>(1/4+, 1)</math>. Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. <math>A</math>) is kept fixed. | ||
** LWP for smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Grs1966|Grs1966]] | ** LWP for smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Grs1966|Grs1966]] | ||
** GWP for small smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Ge1991|Ge1991]] | ** GWP for small smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Ge1991|Ge1991]] | ||
* When n=4, GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?) | * When <math>n=4</math>, GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?) | ||
In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in [[Bibliography#MasNa2003|MasNa2003]]. | In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in [[Bibliography#MasNa2003|MasNa2003]]. | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
This equation essentially reads | This equation essentially reads | ||
<center> | <center><math>D y = f y - y </math></center> | ||
<center><math>Box f = \underline{y} y </math></center> | |||
where y is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), | where <math>y</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), <math>D</math> is the Dirac operator and <math>f</math> is a scalar (real) field. We put <br /> <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>( f , f _t)</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>. | ||
The energy class is essentially (s_1,s_2) = (1/2,1), but the energy density is not positive. However, the L^2 norm of y is also positive and conserved.. | The energy class is essentially <math>(s_1,s_2) = (1/2,1)</math>, but the energy density is not positive. However, the <math>L^2</math> norm of <math>y</math> is also positive and conserved.. | ||
* Scaling is (s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1). | * Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>. | ||
* When n=1 there is GWP for (s_1,s_2) = (1,1) [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]], [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]] and LWP for (s_1, s_2) = (0, 1/2) [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]]. | * When <math>n=1</math> there is GWP for <math>(s_1,s_2) = (1,1)</math> [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]], [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]] and LWP for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (0, 1/2)</math> [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]]. | ||
* When n=2 there are some LWP results in [[Bibliography#Bou2001|Bou2001]] | * When <math>n=2</math> there are some LWP results in [[Bibliography#Bou2001|Bou2001]] | ||
Line 48: | Line 50: | ||
This equation essentially reads | This equation essentially reads | ||
<center> | <center><math>D y - m y = \lambda (\gamma y, y) y </math></center> | ||
where y is a spinor field, m > 0 is the mass, | where <math>y</math> is a spinor field, <math>m > 0</math> is the mass, <math>\lambda</math> is a complex parameter, <math>\gamma</math> is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and <math>(,)</math> is the spinor inner product. | ||
* Scaling is s_c =1 (at least in the massless case m=0). | * Scaling is <math>s_c =1</math> (at least in the massless case <math>m=0</math>). | ||
* In R^3, LWP is known for H^s when s > 1 [[Bibliography#EscVe1997|EscVe1997]] | * In <math>R^3</math>, LWP is known for <math>H^s</math> when <math>s > 1</math> [[Bibliography#EscVe1997|EscVe1997]] | ||
** This can be improved to LWP in H^1 (and GWP for small H^1 data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial H^1 data. | ** This can be improved to LWP in <math>H^1</math> (and GWP for small <math>H^1</math> data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial <math>H^1</math> data. | ||
* In R^3, GWP is known for small H^s data when s > 1 [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper. | * In <math>R^3</math>, GWP is known for small <math>H^s</math> data when <math>s > 1</math> [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper. | ||
---- [[Category:Equations]] | ---- [[Category:Equations]] |
Revision as of 20:27, 3 August 2006
The Maxwell-Dirac equation
[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put in and in .
- Scaling is .
- When , there is GWP for small smooth data Chd1973
- When there is LWP for in the Coulomb gauge Bou1999, and for in the Lorentz gauge Bou1996
- For in the Coulomb gauge this is in Bou1996
- This has recently been improved by Selberg to . Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. ) is kept fixed.
- LWP for smooth data was obtained in Grs1966
- GWP for small smooth data was obtained in Ge1991
- When , GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?)
In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in MasNa2003.
Dirac-Klein-Gordon equation
[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), is the Dirac operator and is a scalar (real) field. We put
in and in .
The energy class is essentially , but the energy density is not positive. However, the norm of is also positive and conserved..
- Scaling is .
- When there is GWP for Chd1973, Bou2000 and LWP for Bou2000.
- When there are some LWP results in Bou2001
Nonlinear Dirac equation
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field, is the mass, is a complex parameter, is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and is the spinor inner product.
- Scaling is (at least in the massless case ).
- In , LWP is known for when EscVe1997
- This can be improved to LWP in (and GWP for small data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial data.
- In , GWP is known for small data when [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper.