Cubic NLW/NLKG on R3

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
  • Scaling is .
  • LWP for by Strichartz estimates (see e.g. LbSo1995; earlier references exist)
    • When the time of existence depends on the profile of the data and not just on the norm.
    • One can improve the critical space to a slightly weaker Besov space (Pl-p2).
    • For one has instantaneous blowup in the focusing case, and unbounded growth of H^s norms in the defocusing case (CtCoTa-p2).
  • GWP for (KnPoVe-p2) for defocussing NLKG.(An alternate proof is in GalPl2003).
    • For this is clear from energy conservation (for both NLKG and NLW).
    • One also has GWP and scattering for data with small norm for general cubic non-linearities (and for either NLKG or NLW).
    • In the defocussing case one has scattering for large data (BaeSgZz1990), see also (Hi-p3).
    • Improvement is certainly possible, both in lowering the s index and in replacing NLKG with NLW.
    • In the focussing case there is blowup from large data by the ODE method.
  • For periodic defocussing NLKG there is a weak turbulence effect in for (low frequencies decay in time) but a symplectic non-squeezing effect in H^{1/2} Kuk1995b.In particular cannot be a symplectic phase space for .