Dirac equations: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
This equation essentially reads
This equation essentially reads


<center>''D_A'' y  <nowiki\geq</nowiki> - y <br /> \Box A +  Ñ  (\div_{x,t} A)= <u> y </u> y </center>
<center><math>D_A  y  =  - y </math></center>
<center><math>\Box A +  \nabla (\nabla_{x,t} A)= \underline{y} y </math></center>


where  y  is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and ''D'' is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put  y  in H^{s_1} and A in H^{s_2} x H^{s_2 - 1}.
where  <math>y</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and <math>D</math> is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put  <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>A</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>.


* Scaling is (s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1).
* Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>.
* When n=1, there is GWP for small smooth data [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]]
* When <math>n=1</math>, there is GWP for small smooth data [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]]
* When n=3 there is LWP for (s_1, s_2) = (1, 1) in the Coulomb gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1999|Bou1999]], and for (s_1, s_2) = (1/2+, 1+) in the Lorentz gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]]
* When <math>n=3</math> there is LWP for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1, 1)</math> in the Coulomb gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1999|Bou1999]], and for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1/2+, 1+)</math> in the Lorentz gauge [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]]
** For (s_1, s_2) = (1,2) in the Coulomb gauge this is in [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]]
** For <math>(s_1, s_2) = (1,2)</math> in the Coulomb gauge this is in [[Bibliography#Bou1996|Bou1996]]
** This has recently been improved by Selberg to (1/4+, 1). Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. A) is kept fixed.
** This has recently been improved by Selberg to <math>(1/4+, 1)</math>. Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. <math>A</math>) is kept fixed.
** LWP for smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Grs1966|Grs1966]]
** LWP for smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Grs1966|Grs1966]]
** GWP for small smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Ge1991|Ge1991]]
** GWP for small smooth data was obtained in [[Bibliography#Ge1991|Ge1991]]
* When n=4, GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?)
* When <math>n=4</math>, GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?)


In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in [[Bibliography#MasNa2003|MasNa2003]].
In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in [[Bibliography#MasNa2003|MasNa2003]].
Line 30: Line 31:
This equation essentially reads
This equation essentially reads


<center>''D''  y <nowiki>= </nowiki> f y - y <br /> Box  f  <nowiki>= </nowiki><u> y </u> y </center>
<center><math>D y = f y - y </math></center>
<center><math>Box  f  = \underline{y} y </math></center>


where  y  is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), ''D'' is the Dirac operator and  f  is a scalar (real) field. We put <br /> y  in H^{s_1} and ( f ,  f _t) in H^{s_2} x H^{s_2 - 1}.
where  <math>y</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), <math>D</math> is the Dirac operator and  <math>f</math> is a scalar (real) field. We put <br /> <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>( f ,  f _t)</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>.


The energy class is essentially (s_1,s_2) = (1/2,1), but the energy density is not positive. However, the L^2 norm of  y  is also positive and conserved..
The energy class is essentially <math>(s_1,s_2) = (1/2,1)</math>, but the energy density is not positive. However, the <math>L^2</math> norm of  <math>y</math> is also positive and conserved..


* Scaling is (s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1).
* Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>.
* When n=1 there is GWP for (s_1,s_2) = (1,1) [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]], [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]] and LWP for (s_1, s_2) = (0, 1/2) [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]].
* When <math>n=1</math> there is GWP for <math>(s_1,s_2) = (1,1)</math> [[Bibliography#Chd1973|Chd1973]], [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]] and LWP for <math>(s_1, s_2) = (0, 1/2)</math> [[Bibliography#Bou2000|Bou2000]].
* When n=2 there are some LWP results in [[Bibliography#Bou2001|Bou2001]]
* When <math>n=2</math> there are some LWP results in [[Bibliography#Bou2001|Bou2001]]


   
   
Line 48: Line 50:
This equation essentially reads
This equation essentially reads


<center>''D''  y -  m  y  <nowiki>= </nowiki> l(g y, y) y </center>
<center><math>D y -  m  y  = \lambda (\gamma y, y) y </math></center>


where  y  is a spinor field, m > 0 is the mass, is a complex parameter,  is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and (,) is the spinor inner product.
where  <math>y</math> is a spinor field, <math>m > 0</math> is the mass, <math>\lambda</math> is a complex parameter,  <math>\gamma</math> is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and <math>(,)</math> is the spinor inner product.


* Scaling is s_c =1 (at least in the massless case m=0).
* Scaling is <math>s_c =1</math> (at least in the massless case <math>m=0</math>).
* In R^3, LWP is known for H^s when s > 1 [[Bibliography#EscVe1997|EscVe1997]]
* In <math>R^3</math>, LWP is known for <math>H^s</math> when <math>s > 1</math> [[Bibliography#EscVe1997|EscVe1997]]
** This can be improved to LWP in H^1 (and GWP for small H^1 data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial H^1 data.
** This can be improved to LWP in <math>H^1</math> (and GWP for small <math>H^1</math> data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial <math>H^1</math> data.
* In R^3, GWP is known for small H^s data when s > 1 [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper.
* In <math>R^3</math>, GWP is known for small <math>H^s</math> data when <math>s > 1</math> [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper.


   
   
----  [[Category:Equations]]
----  [[Category:Equations]]

Revision as of 20:27, 3 August 2006

The Maxwell-Dirac equation

[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]

This equation essentially reads

where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put in and in .

  • Scaling is .
  • When , there is GWP for small smooth data Chd1973
  • When there is LWP for in the Coulomb gauge Bou1999, and for in the Lorentz gauge Bou1996
    • For in the Coulomb gauge this is in Bou1996
    • This has recently been improved by Selberg to . Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. ) is kept fixed.
    • LWP for smooth data was obtained in Grs1966
    • GWP for small smooth data was obtained in Ge1991
  • When , GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?)

In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space [BecMauSb-p2]; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in MasNa2003.




Dirac-Klein-Gordon equation

[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]

This equation essentially reads

where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), is the Dirac operator and is a scalar (real) field. We put
in and in .

The energy class is essentially , but the energy density is not positive. However, the norm of is also positive and conserved..

  • Scaling is .
  • When there is GWP for Chd1973, Bou2000 and LWP for Bou2000.
  • When there are some LWP results in Bou2001




Nonlinear Dirac equation

This equation essentially reads

where is a spinor field, is the mass, is a complex parameter, is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and is the spinor inner product.

  • Scaling is (at least in the massless case ).
  • In , LWP is known for when EscVe1997
    • This can be improved to LWP in (and GWP for small data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable [MacNkrNaOz-p]; in particular one has GWP for radial data.
  • In , GWP is known for small data when [MacNaOz-p2].Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper.