Modified Korteweg-de Vries on T: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
** One has GWP for random data whose Fourier coefficients decay like 1/|k| (times a Gaussian random variable) [[references.html#Bo1995c Bo1995c]]. Indeed one has an invariant measure. Note that such data barely fails to be in H<span class="GramE">^{</span>1/2}, however one can modify the local well-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> theory to go below H^{1/2} provided that one has a decay like O(|k|^{-1+\eps}) on the Fourier coefficients (which is indeed the case almost surely). | ** One has GWP for random data whose Fourier coefficients decay like 1/|k| (times a Gaussian random variable) [[references.html#Bo1995c Bo1995c]]. Indeed one has an invariant measure. Note that such data barely fails to be in H<span class="GramE">^{</span>1/2}, however one can modify the local well-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> theory to go below H^{1/2} provided that one has a decay like O(|k|^{-1+\eps}) on the Fourier coefficients (which is indeed the case almost surely). | ||
[[Category:Integrability]] | |||
[[Category:Airy]] | |||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
Revision as of 07:41, 31 July 2006
The local and global well-posedness theory for the modified Korteweg-de Vries equation on the torus is as follows.
- Scaling is s_c = -1/2.
- C^0 LWP in L^2 in the defocusing case [KpTp-p2]
- C^0 LWP in H^s for s > 3/8 [Takaoka and Tsutsumi?]Note one has to gauge away a nonlinear resonance term before one can apply iteration methods.
- Analytic LWP in H^s for s >= 1/2, in both focusing and defocusing cases references.html#KnPoVe1993 KnPoVe1993, references.html#Bo1993b Bo1993b.
- This is sharp in the sense of analytic well-posedness references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996 or uniform well-posedness [CtCoTa-p]
- C^0 GWP in L^2 in the defocusing case [KpTp-p2]
- Analytic GWP in H^s for s >= 1/2 [[references.html#CoKeStTaTk-p2 CoKeStTkTa-p2]], via the KdV theory and the Miura transform, for both the focussing and defocussing cases.
- Was proven for s >= 1 in references.html#KnPoVe1993 KnPoVe1993, references.html#Bo1993b Bo1993b.
- One has GWP for random data whose Fourier coefficients decay like 1/|k| (times a Gaussian random variable) references.html#Bo1995c Bo1995c. Indeed one has an invariant measure. Note that such data barely fails to be in H^{1/2}, however one can modify the local well-posedness theory to go below H^{1/2} provided that one has a decay like O(|k|^{-1+\eps}) on the Fourier coefficients (which is indeed the case almost surely).
