Quintic NLS: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:


* This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of [#dnls-3_on_R cubic DNLS], and is always at least as well-behaved. It has been proposed as a modifiation of the Gross-Pitaevski approximation for low-dimesional Bose liquids [[Bibliography#KolNewStrQi2000|KolNewStrQi2000]]
* This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of [#dnls-3_on_R cubic DNLS], and is always at least as well-behaved. It has been proposed as a modifiation of the Gross-Pitaevski approximation for low-dimesional Bose liquids [[Bibliography#KolNewStrQi2000|KolNewStrQi2000]]
* Scaling is <math>s_c = 0\,</math>, thus this is an [#L^2-critical_NLS <math>L^2</math> critical NLS].
* Scaling is <math>s_c = 0\,</math>, thus this is an [#L^2-critical_NLS L^2 critical NLS].
* LWP is known for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bibliography#CaWe1990|CaWe1990]], [[Bibliography#Ts1987|Ts1987]].
* LWP is known for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bibliography#CaWe1990|CaWe1990]], [[Bibliography#Ts1987|Ts1987]].
** For <math>s=0\,</math> the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
** For <math>s=0\,</math> the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.

Revision as of 13:59, 3 August 2006

Quintic NLS on

  • This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of [#dnls-3_on_R cubic DNLS], and is always at least as well-behaved. It has been proposed as a modifiation of the Gross-Pitaevski approximation for low-dimesional Bose liquids KolNewStrQi2000
  • Scaling is , thus this is an [#L^2-critical_NLS L^2 critical NLS].
  • LWP is known for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
    • For the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
    • Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
  • GWP for in the defocussing case [Tzi-p]
    • For this is in CoKeStTkTa-p6
    • For this is in CoKeStTkTa-p4.
    • For this is implicit in Tk-p.
    • For this follows from LWP and Hamiltonian conservation.
    • One has GWP and scattering for small data for any quintic non-linearity. The corresponding problem for large data and defocussing nonlinearity is very interesting, but probably very difficult, perhaps only marginally easier than the corresponding problem for the [#Cubic_NLS_on_R^2 2D cubic NLS]. It would suffice to show that the solution has a bounded norm in spacetime.
    • Explicit blowup solutions (with large norm) are known in the focussing case BirKnPoSvVe1996. The blowup rate in is in these solutions. This is not the optimal blowup rate; in fact an example has been constructed where the blowup rate is [Per-p]. Furthermore, one always this blowup behavior (or possibly slower, though one must still blow up by at least ) whenever the energy is negative [MeRap-p], [MeRap-p2], and one either assumes that the mass is close to the critical mass or that is in .
      • One can modify the explicit solutions from BirKnPoSvVe1996 and in fact create solutions which blow up at any collection of specified points in spacetime BoWg1997, Nw1998.
  • Remark: This equation is pseudo-conformally invariant. GWP results in automatically transfer to GWP and scattering results in thanks to the pseudo-conformal transformation.
  • Solitons are -unstable.

Quintic NLS on

  • This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of cubic DNLS, and is always at least as well-behaved.
  • Scaling is .
  • LWP is known for Bo1993.
    • For the solution map is not uniformly continuous from to for any [CtCoTa-p3].
  • GWP is known in the defocusing case for (De Silva, Pavlovic, Staffilani, Tzirakis)
    • For this is commented upon in [Bo-p2] and is a minor modification of [CoKeStTkTa-p].
    • For one has GWP in the defocusing case, or in the focusing case with small norm, by Hamiltonian conservation.
      • In the defocusing case one has GWP for random data whose Fourier coefficients decay like (times a Gaussian random variable) Bo1995c; this is roughly of the regularity of . Indeed one has an invariant measure. In the focusing case the same result holds assuming the norm is sufficiently small.


Quintic NLS on

  • Scaling is .
  • LWP is known for CaWe1990.
    • For the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
    • For we have ill-posedness, indeed the H^s norm can get arbitrarily large arbitrarily quickly [CtCoTa-p2]. In the focusing case we have instantaneous blowup from the virial identity and scaling.
  • GWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 1\,} by Hamiltonian conservation.
    • This has been improved to - in CoKeStTkTa2003b. This result can of course be improved further.
    • Scattering in the energy space Na1999c
    • One also has GWP and scattering for small data for any quintic non-linearity.

Quintic NLS on

  • Scaling is .
  • LWP is known for CaWe1990.
    • For the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
    • For we have ill-posedness, indeed the norm can get arbitrarily large arbitrarily quickly [CtCoTa-p2]. In the focusing case we have instantaneous blowup from the virial identity and scaling.
  • GWP and scattering for in the defocusing case [CoKeStTkTa-p]
    • For radial data this is in [Bo-p], Bo1999.
    • Blowup can occur in the focussing case from Glassey's virial identity.