Quintic NLS on R: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Brain Teasers - How To Build Your Vocabulary ==
The local and global theory of the quintic NLS on <math>R</math> is as follows.


* This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of [[cubic DNLS on R|cubic DNLS]], and is always at least as well-behaved. It has been proposed as a modifiation of the Gross-Pitaevski approximation for low-dimesional Bose liquids [[KolNewStrQi2000]]
* Scaling is <math>s_c = 0\,</math>, thus this is an [[mass critical NLS]].
* LWP is known for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]].
** For <math>s=0\,</math> the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases.
* GWP for <math>s>4/9\,</math> in the defocussing case [[Tzi-p]]
** For <math>s>1/2\,</math> this is in [[CoKeStTkTa2002b]]
** For <math>s>2/3\,</math> this is in [[CoKeStTkTa2001b]].
** For <math>s > 32/33\,</math> this is implicit in [[Tk-p]].
** For <math>s\ge 1\,</math> this follows from LWP and Hamiltonian conservation.
** One has GWP and scattering for small <math>L^2\,</math> data for any quintic non-linearity. The corresponding problem for large <math>L^2\,</math> data and defocussing nonlinearity is very interesting, but probably very difficult, perhaps only marginally easier than the corresponding problem for the [[cubic NLS|2D cubic NLS]]. It would suffice to show that the solution has a bounded <math>L^6\,</math> norm in spacetime.
** Explicit blowup solutions (with large <math>L^2\,</math> norm) are known in the focussing case [[BirKnPoSvVe1996]]. The blowup rate in <math>H^1\,</math> is <math>t^{-1}\,</math> in these solutions. This is not the optimal blowup rate; in fact an example has been constructed where the blowup rate is <math>|t|^{-1/2} (log log|t|)^{1/2}\,</math>[[Per-p]]. Furthermore, one always this blowup behavior (or possibly slower, though one must still blow up by at least <math>|t|^{-1/2}\,</math>) whenever the energy is negative [[MeRap-p]], [[MeRap-p2]], and one either assumes that the mass is close to the critical mass or that <math>xu\,</math> is in <math>L^2\,</math>.
*** One can modify the explicit solutions from [[BirKnPoSvVe1996]] and in fact create solutions which blow up at any collection of specified points in spacetime [[BoWg1997]], [[Nw1998]].
* ''Remark'': This equation is invariant under the [[pseudoconformal transformation]]. GWP results in <math>H^s\,</math> automatically transfer to GWP and scattering results in <math>L^2(|x|^s)\,</math> thanks to the pseudo-conformal transformation.
* Solitons are <math>H^1\,</math>-unstable.


Making ways to improve your vocabulary? [http://www.trickyriddles.com/ '''Brain Teasers'''] can help you do that thing, for in this situation it can make you train your mind on the things that will surely the best for those people who wanted to know things. Making an individual have the chance to find some brain teaser games that most people can have the things that will surely make an individual have such ways that can be better for them. Improving vocabulary can be helped by this Brain teasers for it may exercise your brain. It will make your brain work on thinking. Their are lots of people who wanted to make the things that can be better for them with '''brain teasers''' that can be best for them in life living. Building vocabularies can be the best things an individual can have such ways in life.
[[Category:Schrodinger]]
 
[[Category:Equations]]
 
With this [http://www.trickyriddles.com/ '''Brain Teasers'''] you can make your vocabulary expand. In this kind pf situation most people can have its best situations they may need to have in life. Improving such vocabulary that an individual may need to have such situations they can have in life. Lots of people can have the things that will make you sure to have its best situations in life living this world. '''Brain teasers''' that will make them have such situations that will satisfy their needs in living.

Latest revision as of 03:45, 8 February 2011

The local and global theory of the quintic NLS on is as follows.

  • This equation may be viewed as a simpler version of cubic DNLS, and is always at least as well-behaved. It has been proposed as a modifiation of the Gross-Pitaevski approximation for low-dimesional Bose liquids KolNewStrQi2000
  • Scaling is , thus this is an mass critical NLS.
  • LWP is known for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
    • For the time of existence depends on the profile of the data as well as the norm.
    • Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.
  • GWP for in the defocussing case Tzi-p
    • For this is in CoKeStTkTa2002b
    • For this is in CoKeStTkTa2001b.
    • For this is implicit in Tk-p.
    • For this follows from LWP and Hamiltonian conservation.
    • One has GWP and scattering for small data for any quintic non-linearity. The corresponding problem for large data and defocussing nonlinearity is very interesting, but probably very difficult, perhaps only marginally easier than the corresponding problem for the 2D cubic NLS. It would suffice to show that the solution has a bounded norm in spacetime.
    • Explicit blowup solutions (with large norm) are known in the focussing case BirKnPoSvVe1996. The blowup rate in is in these solutions. This is not the optimal blowup rate; in fact an example has been constructed where the blowup rate is Per-p. Furthermore, one always this blowup behavior (or possibly slower, though one must still blow up by at least ) whenever the energy is negative MeRap-p, MeRap-p2, and one either assumes that the mass is close to the critical mass or that is in .
      • One can modify the explicit solutions from BirKnPoSvVe1996 and in fact create solutions which blow up at any collection of specified points in spacetime BoWg1997, Nw1998.
  • Remark: This equation is invariant under the pseudoconformal transformation. GWP results in automatically transfer to GWP and scattering results in thanks to the pseudo-conformal transformation.
  • Solitons are -unstable.