# Semilinear NLW

### Semilinear wave equations

[Note: Many references needed here!]

Semilinear wave equations (NLW) and semi-linear Klein-Gordon equations (NLKG) take the form

respectively where is a function only of and not of its derivatives, which vanishes to more than first order.

Typically grows like for some power . If is the gradient of some function , then we have a conserved Hamiltonian

For NLKG there is an additional term of in the integrand, which is useful for controlling the low frequencies of . If V is positive definite then we call the NLW defocussing; if is negative definite we call the NLW focussing. The term "coercive" does not have a standard definition, but generally denotes a potential which is positive for large values of .

To analyze these equations in we need the non-linearity to be sufficiently smooth. More precisely, we will always assume either that is smooth, or that is a p^th-power type non-linearity with .

The scaling regularity is . Notable powers of include the -critical power , the -critical or *conformal* power p_{H^{1/2}} = 1 + 4/(d-1), and the -critical* power . *

Dimension d |
Strauss exponent (NLKG) |
-critical exponent |
Strauss exponent (NLW) |
H^{1/2}-critical exponent |
H^1-critical exponent |

1 |
3.56155... |
5 |
infinity |
infinity |
N/A |

2 |
2.41421... |
3 |
3.56155... |
5 |
infinity |

3 |
2 |
2.33333... |
2.41421... |
3 |
5 |

4 |
1.78078... |
2 |
2 |
2.33333... |
3 |

The following necessary conditions for LWP are known. Firstly, for focussing NLW/NLKG one has blowup in finite time for large data, as can be seen by the ODE method. One can scale this and obtain ill-posedness for any focussing NLW/NLKG in the supercritical regime s < s_c; this has been extended to the defocusing case in [CtCoTa-p2]. By using Lorentz scaling instead of isotropic scaling one can also obtain ill-posedness whenever s is below the conformal regularity

in the focusing case; the defocusing case is still open. In the -critical power or below, this condition is stronger than the scaling requirement.

- When and 1 < p < p_{H^{1/2}} with the focusing sign, blowup is known to occur when a certain Lyapunov functional is negative, and the rate of blowup is self-similar MeZaa2003; earlier results are in AntMe2001, CafFri1986, Al1995, KiLit1993, KiLit1993b.

To make sense of the non-linearity in the sense of distributions we need s \geq 0 (indeed we have illposedness below this regularity by a high-to-low cascade, see [CtCoTa-p2]). In the one-dimensional case one also needs the condition to keep the non-linearity integrable, because there is no Strichartz smoothing to exploit.

Finally, in three dimensions one has ill-posedness when and Lb1993.

- In dimensions d\leq3 the above necessary conditions are also sufficient for LWP.
- For d>4 sufficiency is only known assuming the condition

(*)

and excluding the double endpoint when (*) holds with equality and s=s_{conf} Ta1999. The main tool is two-scale Strichartz estimates.

- By using standard Strichartz estimates this was proven with (*) replaced by

see KeTa1998 for the double endpoint when (**) holds with equality and s=s_{conf}, and LbSo1995 for all other cases. A slightly weaker result also appears in Kp1994.

GWP and scattering for NLW is known for data with small norm when is at or above the -critical power (and this has been extended to Besov spaces; see [Pl-p4]. This can be used to obtain self-similar solutions, see [MiaZg-p2]). One also has GWP in in the defocussing case when p is at or below the -critical power. (At the critical power this result is due to Gl1992; see also SaSw1994. For radial data this was shown in Sw1988). For more scattering results, see below.

For the defocussing NLKG, GWP in , , is known in the following cases:

- KnPoVe-p2
- [MiaZgFg-p]
- , and

[MiaZgFg-p]. Note that this is the range of p for which s_conf obeys both the scaling condition and the condition (**).

- [Fo-p]; this is for the NLW instead of NLKG.
- [Fo-p]; this is for the NLW instead of NLKG.

GWP and blowup has also been studied for the NLW with a conformal factor

the significance of this factor is that it behaves well under conformal compactification. See Aa2002, BcKkZz2002, Gue2003 for some recent results.

A substantial scattering theory for NLW and NLKG is known.

The non-relativistic limit of NLKG has attracted a fair amount of research.

#### Specific semilinear wave equations

- Sine-Gordon
- Quadratic NLW/NLKG
- Cubic NLW/NLKG (on R, on R^2, on R^3, and on R^4
- Quartic NLW/NLKG
- Quintic NLW/NLKG (on R, on R^2, and on R^3
- Septic NLW/NLKG (on R, on R^2, and on R^3)