Schrodinger:quadratic NLS: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ojcoolissimo (talk | contribs) |
Ojcoolissimo (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
====Quadratic NLS on <math>R^2</math>==== | ====Quadratic NLS on <math>R^2</math>==== | ||
* Scaling | * Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math> | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for s | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s>=0\,</math> [[Bibliography#CaWe1990|CaWe1990]], [[Bibliography#Ts1987|Ts1987]]. | ||
** In the Hamiltonian case (|u| u) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p] | ** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p] | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of < | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[Bibliography#St1997|St1997]], [[references:CoDeKnSt-p CoDeKnSt-p]]. | ||
** This can be improved to the Besov space B^{-3/4}_{2,1} [MurTao-p]. | ** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [MurTao-p]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[references:Ta-p2 Ta-p2]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type |u| u) we have GWP for s | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s>= 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
** Below L^2 we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ||
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
</center></div> | </center></div> | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
====Quadratic NLS on T^2==== | ====Quadratic NLS on T^2==== |
Revision as of 21:06, 29 July 2006
Quadratic NLS
Equations of the form
which a quadratic function of its arguments are quadratic nonlinear Schrodinger equations.
Quadratic NLS on R
- Scaling is
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- This can be improved to the Besov space [MurTao-p]. The bilinear estimates fail for references:NaTkTs-p NaTkTs2001.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- Since these equations do not have conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- If the non-linearity is then there is GWP in thanks to conservation, and ill-posedness below by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
Quadratic NLS on
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Bo1993. In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p]
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on
- Scaling
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p]
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to St1997, references:CoDeKnSt-p CoDeKnSt-p.
- This can be improved to the Besov space [MurTao-p].
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to references:Ta-p2 Ta-p2.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
Quadratic NLS on T^2
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of u u type then one can obtain LWP for s > -1/2 references#Gr-p2 Gr-p2
Quadratic NLS on
- Scaling is sc = -1/2.
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for s ³ 0 CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of u u or u u type then one can push LWP to s > -1/2. St1997, references:CoDeKnSt-p CoDeKnSt-p.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of u u type then one can push LWP to s > -1/4. references:Ta-p2 Ta-p2.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type |u| u) we have GWP for s ³ 0 by L2 conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- Below L^2 we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
Quadratic NLS on
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of u u type then one can obtain LWP for s > -3/10 references#Gr-p2 Gr-p2