Wave maps on R2: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Scaling is s_c = 1 (energy-critical). | * Scaling is s_c = 1 (energy-critical). | ||
* LWP in H^1 [[Tt-p2]] | * LWP in H^1 ([[Tt-p2]]) | ||
** For B^{1,1}_2 this is in [[Tt2001b]]. | ** For B^{1,1}_2 this is in [[Tt2001b]]. | ||
** LWP in H^s, s>1 was shown in [[KlSb1997]]. | ** LWP in H^s, s>1 was shown in [[KlSb1997]]. | ||
** For s>7/4 this can be shown by Strichartz methods. | ** For s>7/4 this can be shown by Strichartz methods. | ||
** For s>2 this can be shown by energy estimates. | ** For s>2 this can be shown by energy estimates. | ||
* GWP and regularity is known for small energy when the target manifold is boundedly parallelizable [[Tt-p2]] | * GWP and regularity is known for small energy when the target manifold is boundedly parallelizable ([[Tt-p2]]) | ||
** When the target manifold is H^2, regularity was obtained by Krieger [[Kri-p]] | ** When the target manifold is H^2, regularity was obtained by Krieger ([[Kri-p]]) | ||
** When the target manifold is a sphere, regularity was obtained in [[Ta-p6]] | ** When the target manifold is a sphere, regularity was obtained in [[Ta-p6]] | ||
** For small B^{1,1}_2 data GWP is in [[Tt2001b]] | ** For small B^{1,1}_2 data GWP is in [[Tt2001b]] | ||
** GWP and regularity for small H^1 data was known for corotational wave maps, and can be extended to large H^1 data when the target is geodesically convex [[SaSw1993]], [[Sw-p2]]; see also [[SaTv1992]], [[Gl-p]]. In the later papers the result is obtained for quite general rotationally symmetric manifolds, such as non-compact manifolds, although one generically expects blow-up for certain manifolds such as the sphere (see e.g. [[Sw-p2]], or the numerics in [[BizCjTb2001]], [[IbLie-p]]). The question of large H^1 GWP and regularity is equivalent to the non-existence of non-constant harmonic maps on the target [[Sw-p2]]. The corotational results have been extended to wave maps with torsion in [[AcIb2000]]. | ** GWP and regularity for small H^1 data was known for corotational wave maps, and can be extended to large H^1 data when the target is geodesically convex ([[SaSw1993]], [[Sw-p2]]); see also [[SaTv1992]], [[Gl-p]]. In the later papers the result is obtained for quite general rotationally symmetric manifolds, such as non-compact manifolds, although one generically expects blow-up for certain manifolds such as the sphere (see e.g. [[Sw-p2]], or the numerics in [[BizCjTb2001]], [[IbLie-p]]). The question of large H^1 GWP and regularity is equivalent to the non-existence of non-constant harmonic maps on the target ([[Sw-p2]]). The corotational results have been extended to wave maps with torsion in [[AcIb2000]]. | ||
** Regularity is also known for large smooth radial data [[CdTv1993]] assuming a convexity condition on the target manifold. This convexity condition was relaxed in [[Sw2002]], and then removed completely in [[Sw2003]]. One also has a pointwise bound on the diameter of the range of the wave map in the radial case under similar conditions on the manifold [[CdTv1993b]] | ** Regularity is also known for large smooth radial data ([[CdTv1993]]) assuming a convexity condition on the target manifold. This convexity condition was relaxed in [[Sw2002]], and then removed completely in [[Sw2003]]. One also has a pointwise bound on the diameter of the range of the wave map in the radial case under similar conditions on the manifold ([[CdTv1993b]]). | ||
** It is an important open problem whether one has regularity for all large smooth data, at least in the negative curvature case. A slightly harder problem would be to obtain GWP in the critical space H^1. | ** It is an important open problem whether one has regularity for all large smooth data, at least in the negative curvature case. A slightly harder problem would be to obtain GWP in the critical space H^1. | ||
*** When the target manifold is a sphere, numerical evidence seems to suggest energy concentration and singularity formulation for large equivariant data [[IbLie-p]].In the equivariant case, examples of blowup in H^{1+eps} on domains |x|^alpha < t can be constructed if one adds a forcing term on the right-hand side [[GeIv-p]] | *** When the target manifold is a sphere, numerical evidence seems to suggest energy concentration and singularity formulation for large equivariant data ([[IbLie-p]]). In the equivariant case, examples of blowup in H^{1+eps} on domains |x|^alpha < t can be constructed if one adds a forcing term on the right-hand side ([[GeIv-p]]). | ||
** Global weak solutions are known for large energy data [[MuSw1996]], [[FrMuSw1998]] | ** Global weak solutions are known for large energy data ([[MuSw1996]], [[FrMuSw1998]]) but as far as is known these solutions might develop singularities or become "ghost" solutions. | ||
* When the domain and target are S<sup>2</sup>, stationary-rotating solutions exist and are stable with respect to corotational perturbations [[SaTv1997]] | * When the domain and target are S<sup>2</sup>, stationary-rotating solutions exist and are stable with respect to corotational perturbations ([[SaTv1997]]). | ||
* BMO-type estimates on distance functions were obtained in [[Gl1998]] | * BMO-type estimates on distance functions were obtained in [[Gl1998]]. | ||
[[Category:Wave]] | [[Category:Wave]] | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] |
Revision as of 04:46, 2 August 2006
The theory for wave maps on is as follows.
- Scaling is s_c = 1 (energy-critical).
- LWP in H^1 (Tt-p2)
- GWP and regularity is known for small energy when the target manifold is boundedly parallelizable (Tt-p2)
- When the target manifold is H^2, regularity was obtained by Krieger (Kri-p)
- When the target manifold is a sphere, regularity was obtained in Ta-p6
- For small B^{1,1}_2 data GWP is in Tt2001b
- GWP and regularity for small H^1 data was known for corotational wave maps, and can be extended to large H^1 data when the target is geodesically convex (SaSw1993, Sw-p2); see also SaTv1992, Gl-p. In the later papers the result is obtained for quite general rotationally symmetric manifolds, such as non-compact manifolds, although one generically expects blow-up for certain manifolds such as the sphere (see e.g. Sw-p2, or the numerics in BizCjTb2001, IbLie-p). The question of large H^1 GWP and regularity is equivalent to the non-existence of non-constant harmonic maps on the target (Sw-p2). The corotational results have been extended to wave maps with torsion in AcIb2000.
- Regularity is also known for large smooth radial data (CdTv1993) assuming a convexity condition on the target manifold. This convexity condition was relaxed in Sw2002, and then removed completely in Sw2003. One also has a pointwise bound on the diameter of the range of the wave map in the radial case under similar conditions on the manifold (CdTv1993b).
- It is an important open problem whether one has regularity for all large smooth data, at least in the negative curvature case. A slightly harder problem would be to obtain GWP in the critical space H^1.
- When the target manifold is a sphere, numerical evidence seems to suggest energy concentration and singularity formulation for large equivariant data (IbLie-p). In the equivariant case, examples of blowup in H^{1+eps} on domains |x|^alpha < t can be constructed if one adds a forcing term on the right-hand side (GeIv-p).
- Global weak solutions are known for large energy data (MuSw1996, FrMuSw1998) but as far as is known these solutions might develop singularities or become "ghost" solutions.
- When the domain and target are S2, stationary-rotating solutions exist and are stable with respect to corotational perturbations (SaTv1997).
- BMO-type estimates on distance functions were obtained in Gl1998.