KP-II equation: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (sp) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Scaling is s1 + 2s2 + 1/2 = 0. | * Scaling is s1 + 2s2 + 1/2 = 0. | ||
* GWP for s1 > -1/14, s2 = 0 [IsMj2003]. | * GWP for s1 > -1/14, s2 = 0 [[IsMj2003]]. | ||
** For s1 > -1/64 this is also in [IsMj2001]. | ** For s1 > -1/64 this is also in [[IsMj2001]]. | ||
* GWP for s1 > -1/78, s2 = 0 [ | * GWP for s1 > -1/78, s2 = 0 [[Tk2000]] assuming a moment condition. | ||
** A similar result, with a slightly stricter constraint on s1 but no moment condition, was obtained in [ | ** A similar result, with a slightly stricter constraint on s1 but no moment condition, was obtained in [[Tz2000]]. | ||
** For s1 = s2 ³ 0 this was proven in [Bo1993c], and this argument also applies to the periodic setting. Heuristically this result is indicated by the local smoothing estimates in [Sau1993]. | ** For s1 = s2 ³ 0 this was proven in [[Bo1993c]], and this argument also applies to the periodic setting. Heuristically this result is indicated by the local smoothing estimates in [[Sau1993]]. | ||
LWP for s1 > -1/3, s2 = 0 [ | LWP for s1 > -1/3, s2 = 0 [[TkTz2001]], [[IsMj2001]] | ||
** For s1 > -1/4, s2 = 0 this was shown in [ | ** For s1 > -1/4, s2 = 0 this was shown in [[Tk2000b]] | ||
** For s1 > -e, s2 = 0 and small data this was shown in [Tz1999]. | ** For s1 > -e, s2 = 0 and small data this was shown in [[Tz1999]]. | ||
** For s1 = s2 ³ 0 this was proven in [Bo1993c], and this argument also applies to the periodic setting. | ** For s1 = s2 ³ 0 this was proven in [[Bo1993c]], and this argument also applies to the periodic setting. | ||
** For s1, s2 ³ 3 this is in [Uk1989] | ** For s1, s2 ³ 3 this is in [[Uk1989]] | ||
** Related results are in [IoNu1998], [IsMjStb2001]. | ** Related results are in [[IoNu1998]], [[IsMjStb2001]]. | ||
* Weak solutions in a weighted L2 space were constructed in [Fa1990]. | * Weak solutions in a weighted L2 space were constructed in [[Fa1990]]. | ||
* For s1 < -1/3 the natural bilinear estimate fails [ | * For s1 < -1/3 the natural bilinear estimate fails [[TkTz2001]]. | ||
* Remark: Unlike KP-I, KP-II does not admit soliton solutions. | * Remark: Unlike KP-I, KP-II does not admit soliton solutions. | ||
The KP-II equation can be generalized to three dimensions (replace partial_yy with partial_yy + partial_zz), with s_1 regularity in the x direction and s_2 in the y,z directions. Scaling is now s_1 + 2s_2 – ½ = 0. In isotropic spaces, local well-posedness in H^s with s > 3/2 was established assuming the low frequency condition that partial_x^{-1} u is also in H^s [Tz1999]. Anisotropically, local well-posedness in the space s_1 > 1, s_2 > 0 was established in [IsLopMj-p]. | The KP-II equation can be generalized to three dimensions (replace partial_yy with partial_yy + partial_zz), with s_1 regularity in the x direction and s_2 in the y,z directions. Scaling is now s_1 + 2s_2 – ½ = 0. In isotropic spaces, local well-posedness in H^s with s > 3/2 was established assuming the low frequency condition that partial_x^{-1} u is also in H^s [[Tz1999]]. Anisotropically, local well-posedness in the space s_1 > 1, s_2 > 0 was established in [[IsLopMj-p]]. | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | |||
[[Category:Integrability]] |
Latest revision as of 01:22, 17 March 2007
The KP-II equation is the special case of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation when the parameter is positive.
- Scaling is s1 + 2s2 + 1/2 = 0.
- GWP for s1 > -1/14, s2 = 0 IsMj2003.
- For s1 > -1/64 this is also in IsMj2001.
- GWP for s1 > -1/78, s2 = 0 Tk2000 assuming a moment condition.
LWP for s1 > -1/3, s2 = 0 TkTz2001, IsMj2001
- Weak solutions in a weighted L2 space were constructed in Fa1990.
- For s1 < -1/3 the natural bilinear estimate fails TkTz2001.
- Remark: Unlike KP-I, KP-II does not admit soliton solutions.
The KP-II equation can be generalized to three dimensions (replace partial_yy with partial_yy + partial_zz), with s_1 regularity in the x direction and s_2 in the y,z directions. Scaling is now s_1 + 2s_2 – ½ = 0. In isotropic spaces, local well-posedness in H^s with s > 3/2 was established assuming the low frequency condition that partial_x^{-1} u is also in H^s Tz1999. Anisotropically, local well-posedness in the space s_1 > 1, s_2 > 0 was established in IsLopMj-p.