Generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
((Some) cleaning of bibliographic references) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> Cauchy-boundary problem on the half-line is | The <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> Cauchy-boundary problem on the half-line is | ||
<center>< | <center><math>\partial_t u + \partial_x^3 u + \partial_x u + u^k \partial_x u = 0; u(x,0) = u_0(x); u(0,t) = h(t)</math></center> | ||
The sign of | The sign of <math>\partial_x^3 u </math> is important (it makes the influence of the boundary x=0 mostly negligible), the sign of <math>u \partial_x u</math> is not. The drift term <math>\partial_x u</math> is convenient for technical reasons; it is not known whether it is truly necessary. | ||
* LWP is known for initial data in < | * LWP is known for initial data in <math>H^s</math> and boundary data in <math>H^{(s+1)/3}</math> when <math>s > 3/4</math> [[CoKn-p]]. | ||
** The techniques are based on [[ | ** The techniques are based on [[KnPoVe1993]] and a replacement of the IVBP with a forced IVP. | ||
** This has been improved to s >= | ** This has been improved to <math>s >= \partial_c s = 1/2 - 2/k </math>when <math>k > 4</math> [[CoKn-p]]. | ||
** More specific results are known for [[Korteweg-de Vries on the half-line|KdV]], [[modified Korteweg-de Vries on the half-line|mKdV]], [[gKdV-3 on the half-line|gKdV-3]], and [[gKdV-4 on the half-line|gKdV-4]]. | ** More specific results are known for [[Korteweg-de Vries on the half-line|KdV]], [[modified Korteweg-de Vries on the half-line|mKdV]], [[gKdV-3 on the half-line|gKdV-3]], and [[gKdV-4 on the half-line|gKdV-4]]. | ||
== Miscellaneous gKdV results == | == Miscellaneous gKdV results == | ||
* On R with k > 4, < | * On R with k > 4, <math>gKdV-k </math>is LWP down to scaling: <math>s >= \partial_c s = 1/2 - 2/k </math>[[KnPoVe1993]] | ||
** Was shown for s>3/2 in [[ | ** Was shown for s>3/2 in [[GiTs1989]] | ||
** One has ill-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> in the supercritical regime [[ | ** One has ill-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> in the supercritical regime [[BirKnPoSvVe1996]] | ||
** For small data one has scattering [[ | ** For small data one has scattering [[KnPoVe1993c]].Note that one cannot have scattering in <math>L^2 </math>except in the critical case k=4 because one can scale <span class="SpellE">solitons</span> to be arbitrarily small in the non-critical cases. | ||
** <span class="SpellE">Solitons</span> are H^1-unstable [[ | ** <span class="SpellE">Solitons</span> are <math>H^1</math>-unstable [[BnSouSr1987]] | ||
** If one considers an arbitrary smooth non-linearity (not necessarily a power) then one has LWP for small data in < | ** If one considers an arbitrary smooth non-linearity (not necessarily a power) then one has LWP for small data in <math>H^s, s > 1/2 </math>[[St1995]] | ||
* On R with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is GWP in < | * On R with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is GWP in <math>H^s</math> for s >= 1 [[KnPoVe1993]], though for k >= 4 one needs the <math>L^2 </math>norm to be small; global weak solutions were constructed much earlier, with the same smallness assumption when k >= 4. This should be improvable below <math>H^1 </math>for all k. | ||
* On R with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k has the < | * On R with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k has the <math>H^s</math> norm growing like <math>t^{(s-1)} </math>in time for any integer s >= 1 [[St1997b]] | ||
* On R with any non-linearity, a non-zero solution to <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> cannot be supported on the half-line R^+ (or R^-) for two different times [[ | * On R with any non-linearity, a non-zero solution to <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> cannot be supported on the half-line <math>R^+ </math>(or <math>R^-</math>) for two different times [[KnPoVe2003]], [[KnPoVe-p4]]. | ||
** In the completely | ** In the [[completely integrable]] cases k=1,2 this is in [[Zg1992]] | ||
** Also, a non-zero solution to <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> cannot vanish on a rectangle in <span class="SpellE">spacetime</span> [[ | ** Also, a non-zero solution to <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> cannot vanish on a rectangle in <span class="SpellE">spacetime</span> [[SauSc1987]]; see also [[Bo1997b]]. | ||
** Extensions to higher order <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> type equations are in [[ | ** Extensions to higher order <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span> type equations are in [[Bo1997b]], [[KnPoVe-p5]]. | ||
* On R with non-integer k, one has decay of < | * On R with non-integer k, one has decay of <math>O(t^{-1/3}) in L^\infty</math> for small decaying data if <math>k > {(19 - \sqrt(57)) \over 4} \sim 2.8625...</math> [[CtWs1991]] | ||
** A similar result for k > (5+ | ** A similar result for <math> k > (5+\sqrt(73))/4 \sim 3.39... </math><span class="GramE">was</span> obtained in [[PoVe1990]]. | ||
** When k=2 solutions decay like O(t^{-1/3}), and when k=1 solutions decay generically like O(t^{-2/3}) but like O( (t/log t)^{-2/3}) for exceptional data [[ | ** When k=2 solutions decay like <math>O(t^{-1/3})</math>, and when k=1 solutions decay generically like <math>O(t^{-2/3})</math> but like <math>O( (t/log t)^{-2/3})</math> for exceptional data [[AbSe1977]] | ||
* In the L^2 <span class="SpellE">subcritical</span> case 0 < k < 4, <span class="SpellE">multisoliton</span> solutions are asymptotically H^1-stable [ | * In the <math>L^2</math> <span class="SpellE">subcritical</span> case 0 < k < 4, <span class="SpellE">multisoliton</span> solutions are asymptotically <math>H^1</math>-stable [[MtMeTsa-p]] | ||
** For a single <span class="SpellE">soliton</span> this is in [MtMe-p3], [ | ** For a single <span class="SpellE">soliton</span> this is in [[MtMe-p3]], [[MtMe-p]], [[Miz2001]]; earlier work is in [[Bj1972]], [[Bn1975]], [[Ws1986]], [[PgWs1994]] | ||
* A dissipative version of <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k was analyzed in [[ | * A dissipative version of <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k was analyzed in [[MlRi2001]] | ||
* On T with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k has the < | * On T with any k, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k has the <math>H^s</math> norm growing like <math>t^{2(s-1)+}</math> in time for any integer s >= 1 [[St1997b]] | ||
* On T with k >= 3, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is LWP for s >= 1/2 [[ | * On T with k >= 3, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is LWP for s >= 1/2 [[CoKeStTkTa-p3]] | ||
** Was shown for s >= 1 in [[ | ** Was shown for s >= 1 in [[St1997c]] | ||
** Analytic well-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> fails for s < 1/2 [[ | ** Analytic well-<span class="SpellE">posedness</span> fails for s < 1/2 [[CoKeStTkTa-p3]], [[KnPoVe1996]] | ||
** For arbitrary smooth non-<span class="SpellE">linearities</span>, weak H^1 solutions were constructed in [[ | ** For arbitrary smooth non-<span class="SpellE">linearities</span>, weak <math>H^1 </math>solutions were constructed in [[Bo1993b]]. | ||
* On T with k >= 3, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is GWP for s >= 1 except in the <span class="SpellE">focussing</span> case [[ | * On T with k >= 3, <span class="SpellE">gKdV</span>-k is GWP for s >= 1 except in the <span class="SpellE">focussing</span> case [[St1997c]] | ||
** The estimates in [[ | ** The estimates in [[CoKeStTkTa-p3]] suggest that this is improvable to 13/14 - 2/7k, but this has only been proven in the sub-critical case k=3 [[CoKeStTkTa-p3]]. In the critical and super-critical cases there are some low-frequency issues which may require the techniques in [[KeTa-p]]. | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
[[Category:Airy]] |
Latest revision as of 20:49, 10 June 2007
Half-line theory
The gKdV Cauchy-boundary problem on the half-line is
The sign of is important (it makes the influence of the boundary x=0 mostly negligible), the sign of is not. The drift term is convenient for technical reasons; it is not known whether it is truly necessary.
- LWP is known for initial data in and boundary data in when CoKn-p.
Miscellaneous gKdV results
- On R with k > 4, is LWP down to scaling: KnPoVe1993
- Was shown for s>3/2 in GiTs1989
- One has ill-posedness in the supercritical regime BirKnPoSvVe1996
- For small data one has scattering KnPoVe1993c.Note that one cannot have scattering in except in the critical case k=4 because one can scale solitons to be arbitrarily small in the non-critical cases.
- Solitons are -unstable BnSouSr1987
- If one considers an arbitrary smooth non-linearity (not necessarily a power) then one has LWP for small data in St1995
- On R with any k, gKdV-k is GWP in for s >= 1 KnPoVe1993, though for k >= 4 one needs the norm to be small; global weak solutions were constructed much earlier, with the same smallness assumption when k >= 4. This should be improvable below for all k.
- On R with any k, gKdV-k has the norm growing like in time for any integer s >= 1 St1997b
- On R with any non-linearity, a non-zero solution to gKdV cannot be supported on the half-line (or ) for two different times KnPoVe2003, KnPoVe-p4.
- On R with non-integer k, one has decay of for small decaying data if CtWs1991
- In the subcritical case 0 < k < 4, multisoliton solutions are asymptotically -stable MtMeTsa-p
- A dissipative version of gKdV-k was analyzed in MlRi2001
- On T with any k, gKdV-k has the norm growing like in time for any integer s >= 1 St1997b
- On T with k >= 3, gKdV-k is LWP for s >= 1/2 CoKeStTkTa-p3
- Was shown for s >= 1 in St1997c
- Analytic well-posedness fails for s < 1/2 CoKeStTkTa-p3, KnPoVe1996
- For arbitrary smooth non-linearities, weak solutions were constructed in Bo1993b.
- On T with k >= 3, gKdV-k is GWP for s >= 1 except in the focussing case St1997c
- The estimates in CoKeStTkTa-p3 suggest that this is improvable to 13/14 - 2/7k, but this has only been proven in the sub-critical case k=3 CoKeStTkTa-p3. In the critical and super-critical cases there are some low-frequency issues which may require the techniques in KeTa-p.