Talk:Hartree equation: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) (Explanation about Hartree-Fock method) |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
---- | |||
As a physicist I am somewhat unfamiliar with this form of Hartree equation. The reason for this is that this equation is about many-body problems (e.g. large atoms). This means that one has to consider many-body wavefunctions like | As a physicist I am somewhat unfamiliar with this form of Hartree equation. The reason for this is that this equation is about many-body problems (e.g. large atoms). This means that one has to consider many-body wavefunctions like | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
the modification due to Fock to the Hartree method is to use fully antisymmetric wavefunctions as happens to fermionic matter represented by a determinat (Slater determinant). This introduces a further term into the equation due to the particle exchange (exchange integral). | the modification due to Fock to the Hartree method is to use fully antisymmetric wavefunctions as happens to fermionic matter represented by a determinat (Slater determinant). This introduces a further term into the equation due to the particle exchange (exchange integral). --[[User:Jonlester|Jonlester]] 18:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 9 July 2007
There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details. Terry 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
As a physicist I am somewhat unfamiliar with this form of Hartree equation. The reason for this is that this equation is about many-body problems (e.g. large atoms). This means that one has to consider many-body wavefunctions like
the modification due to Fock to the Hartree method is to use fully antisymmetric wavefunctions as happens to fermionic matter represented by a determinat (Slater determinant). This introduces a further term into the equation due to the particle exchange (exchange integral). --Jonlester 18:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
