|
|
| (59 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| Older discussion [[DispersiveWiki:Community Portal/Archive|has been archived here]]. | | Older discussion [[DispersiveWiki:Community Portal/Archive|has been archived here]]. |
|
| |
|
| == Linking to math reviews ==
| | Would you like to help out? Suggested projects are posted on our [[Current events| current projects]] page. |
|
| |
|
| [http://www.math.tamu.edu/~comech Andrew Comech] has written a tool called [http://www.math.tamu.edu/~comech/tools/bibget/ bibget]. It does some neat things, e.g. UNIXPROMPT> bibget -r MR2121437
| | == Connections to other Wikis == |
| instantly retrieves the relevant math reviews reference in bibtex format. [[User:Colliand|Colliand]] 00:07, 31 July 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| :Do we want to put references as <nowiki>[[Au2006a]]</nowiki> or <nowiki>[[Bibliography:Au2006a]]</nowiki>? Using the one page per reference section has the major advantage of allowing us to use the "what links here" link to hunt down all old links when a preprint is published, so I'm convinced this is the right way to go. [[User:Pblue|Pblue]] 11:32, 31 July 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ::I think by fiat we are now using the former, as it is easier to type and looks nicer too. Presumably the Bibliography category will let us organise these pages easily even in the former case. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 23:59, 1 August 2006 (EDT) | | There is a [http://www.wikiindex.com/Category:Math list of Math Wiki's] on Wikipedia. |
| | See for example the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Partial_differential_equations collection] of PDE related pages on wikipedia. For basic concepts in PDE, perhaps we should further develop |
| | those pages. For more specialized resources like a bibliography, it may be better to use this space. [[User:Colliand|Colliand]] 11:28, 15 September 2006 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| I corresponded with AMS about linking to mathscinet from our bibliography pages. They directed me to the web page
| | == Notation == |
| http://www.ams.org/msnhtml/getitem.html . So, for published papers in our bibliography we are free to link to mathscinet. For example, see http://tosio.math.toronto.edu/wiki/index.php/Bo1999b [[User:Colliand|Colliand]] 12:31, 2 August 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| :Some reference pages, such as [[LiPo1993]], have partial mathscinet links [http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=id]. The string ''id'' at the end should be replaced by the associated math review number MR1249105. Is there an automated way to get these inserted into all the pages? [[User:Colliand|Colliand]] 00:10, 3 August 2006 (EDT)
| | This wiki looks like a great resource for people like me who don't deal with PDE's full time, but need help every once in a while. One request: could someone compile a page discussing the notation? As a physicist, I hardly ever see (for example) Δ used to denote the Laplacian; usually, it's ∇<sup>2</sup>. Without a central notation page, it's hard to decipher some of the equations. And does y<sub>x</sub> mean the partial derivative of y with respect to x? Thanks. [[User:JessRiedel|JessRiedel]] 10:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC) |
| | |
| I am guessing that because we don't have specific tags for author, title, etc. one would need to build a reasonably smart system to automate things. Plus one expects references to continually be added by new authors, which we probably can't expect to adhere to any really complicated rules. Still a semi-automated system may be possible. Presumably once a mathscinet link is available one can query the AMS database in some automatic manner to aid our own somehow. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:39, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| :Further correspondence with AMS from Drew Burton:
| |
| ::Getitem has the other nice feature that users without MathSciNet
| |
| ::licenses do get the cannonical bibliographic information and links to
| |
| ::the original article at the publisher's site when possible.
| |
| | |
| ::Another free tool that might be of interest is MRef for looking up
| |
| ::references in the MathSciNet database at http://www.ams.org/mref. It
| |
| ::takes normal reference strings and does an awfully good job of looking
| |
| ::them up in our database. It provides a variety of result formats.
| |
| | |
| ::E.g. I used it on your entry for BusPer1993 and got:
| |
| ::Buslaev, V. S.; Perel\cprime man, G. S. Scattering for the nonlinear
| |
| ::Schrödinger equation: states that are close to a soliton. (Russian)
| |
| ::Algebra i Analiz 4 (1992), no. 6, 63--102; translation in St.
| |
| ::Petersburg Math. J. 4 (1993), no. 6, 1111--1142 MR1199635 (94b:35256)
| |
| | |
| ::There is more information about our linking tools at
| |
| ::http://www.ams.org/tools in the "Linking" section.''
| |
| | |
| :It would be nice if we could write a link which takes the reference data on our bibliography pages already, uses that information to :search mathscinet, then displays the relevant mathscinet article listing. I don't know how to write such a link but will start to :experiment a bit. [[User:Colliand|Colliand]] 11:19, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ::In the long term, I think we should build a template for bibliography articles, with various arguments for bibliographic data such as author, title, etc. The advantage is that we can change the format of all articles simultaneously by editing the template. In the short term, the important thing is to get the basic data in the right place; data migration can then be done basically at any time.
| |
| | |
| == Categories ==
| |
| | |
| I've started putting in some categories into the Wiki; they provide a convenient way to dynamically index all pages associated to a single topic, and can themselves contain content of their own. Any page can have as many categories as it wants, so please feel free to design your own categories as you please. In the worst case they can always be merged or otherwise cleaned up. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:24, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Redirects ==
| |
| | |
| Another useful Wiki feature is redirects. If a page contains nothing but the line
| |
| : <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[some-other-page]]</nowiki>
| |
| then it will automatically redirect to some-other-page. This is useful for merging two otherwise redundant pages, or dealing with a concept that has many spellings or variant names, or with two topics which for some reason are being treated on a single page for now. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:24, 29 July 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Open for business? ==
| |
| | |
| The wiki is developing nicely. Not only is the conversion of the existing text reaching a point where the pages look nice (and invitingly easy to edit), the wiki format is also now suggesting some natural additions beyond the original brief of listing local and global wellposedness results for various equations. I particularly like the developing [[:Category:Concept|concepts category]], making this wiki more encyclopediac (Dispersopedia, anyone?). Anyway, maybe we can start inviting some more people in on the project. Next week when I return to UCLA I think I will advertise it on my own web page. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 03:00, 31 July 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| :I have sent out a few invitations by email already. How about we arbitrarily declare Aug 7 "opening day"? :) [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:39, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| == Stubs ==
| |
| | |
| I have stolen the stub template from Wikipedia and adapted it here. A lot of smaller articles in need of expansion are now [[DispersiveWiki:stub|stubs]] to be expanded; see the [[:Category:Stubs|stub category]] for a listing. It's easy enough to tag something as a stub, just put <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> at the top of the offending page. Hopefully this will be one easy way for users to make significant contributions to this wiki :) [[User:Tao|Terry]] 01:07, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
| |
This is the portal for discussing the general Dispersive Wiki project and for making announcements. You can sign your name and timestamp by writing three or four tildes ~~~ at the end of your message, and use : at the start of a message to indent. Use == (title) == to start a new topic.
Older discussion has been archived here.
Would you like to help out? Suggested projects are posted on our current projects page.
Connections to other Wikis
There is a list of Math Wiki's on Wikipedia.
See for example the collection of PDE related pages on wikipedia. For basic concepts in PDE, perhaps we should further develop
those pages. For more specialized resources like a bibliography, it may be better to use this space. Colliand 11:28, 15 September 2006 (EDT)
Notation
This wiki looks like a great resource for people like me who don't deal with PDE's full time, but need help every once in a while. One request: could someone compile a page discussing the notation? As a physicist, I hardly ever see (for example) Δ used to denote the Laplacian; usually, it's ∇2. Without a central notation page, it's hard to decipher some of the equations. And does yx mean the partial derivative of y with respect to x? Thanks. JessRiedel 10:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
