Quadratic NLS: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ojcoolissimo (talk | contribs) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{equation | |||
| name = Quadratic NLS | |||
| equation = <math>iu_t + \Delta u = Q(u, \overline{u})</math> | |||
| fields = <math>u: \R \times \R^d \to \mathbb{C}</math> | |||
| data = <math>u(0) \in H^s(\R^d)</math> | |||
| hamiltonian = non-Hamiltonian | |||
| linear = [[free Schrodinger equation|Schrodinger]] | |||
| nonlinear = [[semilinear]] | |||
| critical = <math>\dot H^{d/2 - 2}(\R^d)</math> | |||
| criticality = N/A | |||
| covariance = N/A | |||
| lwp = varies | |||
| gwp = - | |||
| parent = [[NLS]] | |||
| special = Quadratic NLS on R, T, R^2, T^2, R^3, T^3 | |||
| related = - | |||
}} | |||
===Quadratic NLS=== | ===Quadratic NLS=== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 29: | ||
* Scaling is <math>s_c=-3/2\,.</math> | * Scaling is <math>s_c=-3/2\,.</math> | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[ | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [ | ** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao2004]]. The <math>X^{s,b}\,</math> bilinear estimates fail for <math>H^{-3/4}\,</math> [[NaTkTs2001]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
* Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
* If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math> thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | * If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math> thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>==== | ====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>==== | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[ | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bo1993]]. In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]] | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
| Line 39: | Line 47: | ||
* Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math> | * Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math> | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[ | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | ||
** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p] | ** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]] | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt2001]]. | ||
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [ | ** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao2004]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta2001]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
====Quadratic NLS on T^2==== | ====Quadratic NLS on T^2==== | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -1/2\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -1/2\,</math> [[Gr-p2]] | ||
====Quadratic NLS on <math>R^3</math>==== | ====Quadratic NLS on <math>R^3</math>==== | ||
* Scaling is <math>s_c = -1/2.\,</math> | * Scaling is <math>s_c = -1/2.\,</math> | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[ | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt2001]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta2001]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
====Quadratic NLS on <math>T^3</math>==== | ====Quadratic NLS on <math>T^3</math>==== | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -3/10\,</math> [[ | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -3/10\,</math> [[Gr-p2]]. | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:30, 17 March 2007
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Equation | |
| Fields | |
| Data class | |
| Basic characteristics | |
| Structure | non-Hamiltonian |
| Nonlinearity | semilinear |
| Linear component | Schrodinger |
| Critical regularity | |
| Criticality | N/A |
| Covariance | N/A |
| Theoretical results | |
| LWP | varies |
| GWP | - |
| Related equations | |
| Parent class | NLS |
| Special cases | Quadratic NLS on R, T, R^2, T^2, R^3, T^3 |
| Other related | - |
Quadratic NLS
Equations of the form
which a quadratic function of its arguments are quadratic nonlinear Schrodinger equations.
Quadratic NLS on R
- Scaling is
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- This can be improved to the Besov space MurTao2004. The bilinear estimates fail for NaTkTs2001.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- Since these equations do not have conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- If the non-linearity is then there is GWP in thanks to conservation, and ill-posedness below by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.
Quadratic NLS on
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Bo1993. In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle |u| u\,} ) we have GWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 0\,} by Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle L^2\,} conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R^2}
- Scaling Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s_c = -1.\,}
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 0\,}
CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- In the Hamiltonian case (Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle |u| u\,} ) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \underline{uu}\,}
or Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle u u\,}
type then one can push LWP to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s > -3/4.\,}
St1997, CoDeKnSt2001.
- This can be improved to the Besov space Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,} MurTao2004.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle u \underline{u}\,} type then one can push LWP to Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s > -1/4.\,} Ta2001.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle |u| u\,}
) we have GWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 0\,}
by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- Below Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle L^2\,} we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.
Quadratic NLS on T^2
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \underline{uu}\,} type then one can obtain LWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s > -1/2\,} Gr-p2
Quadratic NLS on Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R^3}
- Scaling is Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s_c = -1/2.\,}
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 0\,} CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \underline{uu}\,} or type then one can push LWP to St1997, CoDeKnSt2001.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to Ta2001.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for Gr-p2.