Maxwell-Schrodinger system: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(Changed "Lorentz gauge" to "Lorenz gauge" as this is named after the danish physicist Ludvig Lorenz)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


<center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center>  
<center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center>  
<center><math>F_{ab} = J_b\,</math></center>
<center><math>\partial^aF_{ab} = J_b\,</math></center>


where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by
where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by
Line 15: Line 15:
<center><math>J= |u|^2; J_j= -Im{\underline{u}D_ju}\,</math></center>
<center><math>J= |u|^2; J_j= -Im{\underline{u}D_ju}\,</math></center>


As with the [[MKG|MKG system]], there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorentz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).
As with the [[MKG|MKG system]], there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorenz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).


Let us place u in <math>H^s\,</math>, and A in <math>H^\sigma H^{sigma-1}\,.</math> The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be <math>s = \sigma = 1/2\,.</math>
Let us place u in <math>H^s\,</math>, and A in <math>H^\sigma H^{\sigma-1}\,.</math> The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be <math>s = \sigma = 1/2\,.</math>


* In the Lorentz and Temporal gauges, one has LWP for <math>s \ge 5/3\,</math> and <math>s-1 \le \sigma \le s+1, (5s-2)/3</math> [NkrWad-p]
* GWP in the energy space <math>s=\sigma=1</math> in the Coulomb gauge was established by Bejenaru and Tataru in 2007.  The argument also gives a priori estimates when <math> s>1/2, \sigma=1</math> and LWP when <math> s>3/4, \sigma=1</math>.
** For smooth data (<math>s=\sigma > 5/2\,</math>) in the Lorentz gauge this is in [[NkTs1986]] (this result works in all dimensions)
** In the Lorenz and Temporal gauges, LWP for <math>s \ge 5/3\,</math> and <math>s-1 \le \sigma \le s+1, (5s-2)/3</math> was established in [[NkrWad-p]]
* Global weak solutions are known in the energy class (<math>s=\sigma=1\,</math>) in the Lorentz and Coulomb gauges [[GuoNkSr1996]]. GWP is still open however.
** For smooth data (<math>s=\sigma > 5/2\,</math>) in the Lorenz gauge this is in [[NkTs1986]] (this result works in all dimensions)
* Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [GiVl-p3], [GiVl-p5]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
** Global weak solutions were constructed in the energy class (<math>s=\sigma=1\,</math>) in the Lorenz and Coulomb gauges [[GuoNkSr1996]].  
* Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [[GiVl-p3]], [[GiVl-p5]]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
** A similar result for small data is in [[Ts1993]]
** A similar result for small data is in [[Ts1993]]
* In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known [[Ts1995]]
* In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known [[Ts1995]]

Latest revision as of 13:07, 3 January 2009

Maxwell-Schrodinger system in

This system is a partially non-relativistic analogue of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system, coupling a U(1) connection with a complex scalar field u; it is thus an example of a wave-Schrodinger system. The Lagrangian density is

giving rise to the system of PDE

where the current density is given by

As with the MKG system, there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorenz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).

Let us place u in , and A in The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be

  • GWP in the energy space in the Coulomb gauge was established by Bejenaru and Tataru in 2007. The argument also gives a priori estimates when and LWP when .
    • In the Lorenz and Temporal gauges, LWP for and was established in NkrWad-p
    • For smooth data () in the Lorenz gauge this is in NkTs1986 (this result works in all dimensions)
    • Global weak solutions were constructed in the energy class () in the Lorenz and Coulomb gauges GuoNkSr1996.
  • Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in GiVl-p3, GiVl-p5. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
    • A similar result for small data is in Ts1993
  • In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known Ts1995
  • In two dimensions, GWP for smooth solutions is known TsNk1985