Maxwell-Schrodinger system: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Maxwell-Schrodinger system in <math>R^3</math>: Bejenaru-Tataru) |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) (Changed "Lorentz gauge" to "Lorenz gauge" as this is named after the danish physicist Ludvig Lorenz) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<center><math>J= |u|^2; J_j= -Im{\underline{u}D_ju}\,</math></center> | <center><math>J= |u|^2; J_j= -Im{\underline{u}D_ju}\,</math></center> | ||
As with the [[MKG|MKG system]], there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the | As with the [[MKG|MKG system]], there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorenz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible). | ||
Let us place u in <math>H^s\,</math>, and A in <math>H^\sigma H^{\sigma-1}\,.</math> The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be <math>s = \sigma = 1/2\,.</math> | Let us place u in <math>H^s\,</math>, and A in <math>H^\sigma H^{\sigma-1}\,.</math> The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be <math>s = \sigma = 1/2\,.</math> | ||
* GWP in the energy space <math>s=\sigma=1</math> in the Coulomb gauge was established by Bejenaru and Tataru in 2007. The argument also gives a priori estimates when <math> s>1/2, \sigma=1</math> and LWP when <math> s>3/4, \sigma=1</math>. | * GWP in the energy space <math>s=\sigma=1</math> in the Coulomb gauge was established by Bejenaru and Tataru in 2007. The argument also gives a priori estimates when <math> s>1/2, \sigma=1</math> and LWP when <math> s>3/4, \sigma=1</math>. | ||
** In the | ** In the Lorenz and Temporal gauges, LWP for <math>s \ge 5/3\,</math> and <math>s-1 \le \sigma \le s+1, (5s-2)/3</math> was established in [[NkrWad-p]] | ||
** For smooth data (<math>s=\sigma > 5/2\,</math>) in the | ** For smooth data (<math>s=\sigma > 5/2\,</math>) in the Lorenz gauge this is in [[NkTs1986]] (this result works in all dimensions) | ||
** Global weak solutions were constructed in the energy class (<math>s=\sigma=1\,</math>) in the | ** Global weak solutions were constructed in the energy class (<math>s=\sigma=1\,</math>) in the Lorenz and Coulomb gauges [[GuoNkSr1996]]. | ||
* Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [[GiVl-p3]], [[GiVl-p5]]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity. | * Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [[GiVl-p3]], [[GiVl-p5]]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity. | ||
** A similar result for small data is in [[Ts1993]] | ** A similar result for small data is in [[Ts1993]] |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 3 January 2009
Maxwell-Schrodinger system in
This system is a partially non-relativistic analogue of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system, coupling a U(1) connection with a complex scalar field u; it is thus an example of a wave-Schrodinger system. The Lagrangian density is
giving rise to the system of PDE
where the current density is given by
As with the MKG system, there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorenz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).
Let us place u in , and A in The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be
- GWP in the energy space in the Coulomb gauge was established by Bejenaru and Tataru in 2007. The argument also gives a priori estimates when and LWP when .
- In the Lorenz and Temporal gauges, LWP for and was established in NkrWad-p
- For smooth data () in the Lorenz gauge this is in NkTs1986 (this result works in all dimensions)
- Global weak solutions were constructed in the energy class () in the Lorenz and Coulomb gauges GuoNkSr1996.
- Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in GiVl-p3, GiVl-p5. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
- A similar result for small data is in Ts1993
- In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known Ts1995
- In two dimensions, GWP for smooth solutions is known TsNk1985