Cubic NLW/NLKG: Difference between revisions
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) (→Exact solutions: Adjusted to convention of DW for wave equations) |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) m (Missing a minus sign.) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The cubic nonlinear wave and Klein-Gordon equations have | The cubic nonlinear wave and Klein-Gordon equations have | ||
been studied [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R|on R]], [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R2|on R^2]], and [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R3|on R^3]]. | been studied [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R|on <math>{\mathbb R}</math>]], [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R2|on <math>{\mathbb R}^2</math>]], and [[Cubic NLW/NLKG on R3|on <math>{\mathbb R}^3</math>]]. | ||
== Exact solutions == | == Exact solutions == | ||
This kind of equation displays a class of solutions with a peculiar dispersion | === Technique === | ||
The technique to solve a non-linear equation | |||
<center><math>-\Box\phi + V'(\phi) = 0</math></center> | |||
relies on [[Lorentz invariance]] of the solutions. We consider the reference frame where the solutions depend only on time variable. This reduces the above PDE to an ordinary differential equation as | |||
<center><math>\partial_t^2\phi + V'(\phi) = 0.</math></center> | |||
Then, if we are able to solve this equation, we can get back an exact solution to the equation we started from with the identity | |||
<center><math>\, \phi(x')=\phi(\Lambda x)\!</math></center> | |||
being this the way the scalar field changes under the effect of a Lorentz transformation <math>\, \Lambda \!</math> and being here <math>\, x_\mu=(t,0)\!</math>. Indeed, one notes that the solutions in this frame, <math>\, \phi(t,0)\!</math>, are exact solutions of the given PDE. | |||
=== Solutions === | |||
This kind of equation displays a class of solutions with a peculiar [[dispersion relation]]. To show explicitly this, let us consider the massless equation | |||
<center><math>-\Box\phi + \lambda\phi^3 = 0</math></center> | <center><math>-\Box\phi + \lambda\phi^3 = 0</math></center> | ||
being <math>\lambda>0</math>. An exact solution of this equation is given by | being <math>\, \lambda>0\!</math>. An exact solution of this equation is given by | ||
<center><math>\phi(x) = \mu\left(\frac{2}{\lambda}\right)^{1\over 4}{\rm sn}(p\cdot x+\theta,i),</math></center> | <center><math>\phi(x) = \pm\mu\left(\frac{2}{\lambda}\right)^{1\over 4}{\rm sn}(p\cdot x+\theta,i),</math></center> | ||
being sn a Jacobi elliptic function and <math>\mu,\theta</math> two integration constants, | being <math>\, \rm sn\!</math> a Jacobi elliptic function and <math>\,\mu,\theta\!</math> two integration constants, and the following [[dispersion relation]] holds | ||
<center><math>p^2=\mu^2\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 2}.</math></center> | <center><math>p^2=\mu^2\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 2}.</math></center> | ||
We see that we started with an equation without a mass term but the exact solution describes a wave with a dispersion relation proper to a massive solution. This can be seen as the superposition of an infinite number of massive linear waves through a Fourier series of the Jacobi function, that is | We see that we started with an equation without a mass term but the exact solution describes a wave with a [[dispersion relation]] proper to a massive solution. This can be seen as the superposition of an infinite number of massive linear waves through a Fourier series of the Jacobi function, that is | ||
<center><math>\phi(t,0)=\mu\left(\frac{2}{\lambda}\right)^{1\over 4}\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{2\pi}{K(i)}\frac{e^{\left(n+{1\over 2}\right)\pi}}{1+e^{-(2n+1)\pi}}\sin\left((2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2K(i)}\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 4}\mu t\right)</math></center> | <center><math>\phi(t,0)=\pm\mu\left(\frac{2}{\lambda}\right)^{1\over 4}\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{2\pi}{K(i)}\frac{e^{-\left(n+{1\over 2}\right)\pi}}{1+e^{-(2n+1)\pi}}\sin\left((2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2K(i)}\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 4}\mu t\right)</math></center> | ||
being <math>K(i)</math> an elliptic integral. We recognize the "spectrum" | being <math>K(i)</math> an elliptic integral. We recognize the "spectrum" | ||
Line 26: | Line 42: | ||
<center><math>m_n = (2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2K(i)}\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 4}\mu.</math></center> | <center><math>m_n = (2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2K(i)}\left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{1\over 4}\mu.</math></center> | ||
But a meaning as a mass spectrum can only be given within a quantum field theory. | But a meaning as a mass spectrum can only be given within a quantum field theory [[FraB2006]]. | ||
Similarly, when there is a mass term as in | Similarly, when there is a mass term as in | ||
Line 34: | Line 50: | ||
the exact solution is given by | the exact solution is given by | ||
<center><math>\phi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2\mu^4}{\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}{\rm sn}\left(p\cdot x+\theta,\sqrt{\frac{-\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}{-\mu_0^2 - | <center><math>\phi(x) = \pm\sqrt{\frac{2\mu^4}{\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}{\rm sn}\left(p\cdot x+\theta,\sqrt{\frac{-\mu_0^2 + \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}{-\mu_0^2 - | ||
\sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}\right)</math></center> | \sqrt{\mu_0^4 + 2\lambda\mu^4}}}\right)</math></center> | ||
being now the dispersion relation | being now the [[dispersion relation]] | ||
<center><math>p^2=\mu_0^2+\frac{\lambda\mu^4}{\mu_0^2+\sqrt{\mu_0^4+2\lambda\mu^4}}.</math></center> | <center><math>p^2=\mu_0^2+\frac{\lambda\mu^4}{\mu_0^2+\sqrt{\mu_0^4+2\lambda\mu^4}}.</math></center> | ||
Line 47: | Line 63: | ||
that is given by | that is given by | ||
<center><math>\phi(x) = v\cdot {\rm dn}(p\cdot x+\theta,i),</math></center> | <center><math>\phi(x) =\pm v\cdot {\rm dn}(p\cdot x+\theta,i),</math></center> | ||
being <math>v=\sqrt{\frac{2\mu_0^2}{3\lambda}}</math> and the following dispersion relation holds | being <math>v=\sqrt{\frac{2\mu_0^2}{3\lambda}}</math> and the following [[dispersion relation]] holds | ||
<center><math>p^2=\frac{\lambda v^2}{2}.</math></center> | <center><math>p^2=\frac{\lambda v^2}{2}.</math></center> | ||
These wave solutions are interesting as, notwithstanding we started with an equation with a wrong mass sign, the [[dispersion relation]] has the right one. Besides, Jacobi function <math>\, {\rm dn}\!</math> has no real zeros and so the field is never zero but moves around a given constant value that is initially chosen. This effect is known as spontaneous breaking of symmetry in physics. | |||
[[Category:Wave]] | [[Category:Wave]] | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] |
Latest revision as of 09:11, 1 March 2023
The cubic nonlinear wave and Klein-Gordon equations have been studied on , on , and on .
Exact solutions
Technique
The technique to solve a non-linear equation
relies on Lorentz invariance of the solutions. We consider the reference frame where the solutions depend only on time variable. This reduces the above PDE to an ordinary differential equation as
Then, if we are able to solve this equation, we can get back an exact solution to the equation we started from with the identity
being this the way the scalar field changes under the effect of a Lorentz transformation and being here . Indeed, one notes that the solutions in this frame, , are exact solutions of the given PDE.
Solutions
This kind of equation displays a class of solutions with a peculiar dispersion relation. To show explicitly this, let us consider the massless equation
being . An exact solution of this equation is given by
being a Jacobi elliptic function and two integration constants, and the following dispersion relation holds
We see that we started with an equation without a mass term but the exact solution describes a wave with a dispersion relation proper to a massive solution. This can be seen as the superposition of an infinite number of massive linear waves through a Fourier series of the Jacobi function, that is
being an elliptic integral. We recognize the "spectrum"
But a meaning as a mass spectrum can only be given within a quantum field theory FraB2006.
Similarly, when there is a mass term as in
the exact solution is given by
being now the dispersion relation
Finally, we can write down the exact solution for the case
that is given by
being and the following dispersion relation holds
These wave solutions are interesting as, notwithstanding we started with an equation with a wrong mass sign, the dispersion relation has the right one. Besides, Jacobi function has no real zeros and so the field is never zero but moves around a given constant value that is initially chosen. This effect is known as spontaneous breaking of symmetry in physics.