DispersiveWiki:Community Portal: Difference between revisions
(Some preliminary discussion started) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
What shall we do with the bibliography? It is hard to edit and hard to link to. I am thinking of moving the references to the page in which they are cited, instead of collecting them in one enormous file. This may cause a reference to be cited in more than one place, possibly with slightly different bibliographic data, but this should not be a problem. On the plus side, it makes it easier to find relevant references, and it should be relatively easy for a new user to update a reference or add a new one. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT) | What shall we do with the bibliography? It is hard to edit and hard to link to. I am thinking of moving the references to the page in which they are cited, instead of collecting them in one enormous file. This may cause a reference to be cited in more than one place, possibly with slightly different bibliographic data, but this should not be a problem. On the plus side, it makes it easier to find relevant references, and it should be relatively easy for a new user to update a reference or add a new one. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Another possibility is to put each article on its own page. This could allow direct linking to the article and leave space for annotations and remarks on the article. One could also include links to mathscinet and arxiv. [[User:Colliand|Jim]] 16:54, 28 July 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:54, 28 July 2006
I guess this is as good a page as any to discuss the general Dispersive Wiki project, at least for now. You can sign your name and timestamp by writing three or four tildes ~~~ at the end of your message, and use : at the start of a message to indent. Use == (title) == to start a new topic. You can "watch" this page by clicking on the tab at the top so that you can be notified whenver there is some new discussion here. Terry 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
- For instance, here is an example of indenting. Terry 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
Chopping up into smaller articles
I think we should split the big pages into smaller ones, to take more advantage of hyperlinking. At some point I'll also try to set up categories as is done in Wikipedia (which should presumably be our model for most things here. I've set up a rudimentary example of what I mean by this at the Other equations page, though many pages are still broken or not cleaned up at all. Terry 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
Bibliography
What shall we do with the bibliography? It is hard to edit and hard to link to. I am thinking of moving the references to the page in which they are cited, instead of collecting them in one enormous file. This may cause a reference to be cited in more than one place, possibly with slightly different bibliographic data, but this should not be a problem. On the plus side, it makes it easier to find relevant references, and it should be relatively easy for a new user to update a reference or add a new one. Terry 01:22, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
Another possibility is to put each article on its own page. This could allow direct linking to the article and leave space for annotations and remarks on the article. One could also include links to mathscinet and arxiv. Jim 16:54, 28 July 2006 (EDT)