QNLW: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/12</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/12</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ||
** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/8</math> this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/8</math> this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). | ||
* When <math>d=3,4,5</math> one has LWP for <math>s > d/2 + 1/2</math> [[ | * When <math>d=3,4,5</math> one has LWP for <math>s > d/2 + 1/2</math> [[SmhTt-p]] (using parametrices and the equation for the metric); in the specific case of the [[Einstein equations]] see [[KlRo-p3]], [[KlRo-p4]], [[KlRo-p5]] (using vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ||
** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/7</math> (approx) and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[KlRo-p2]] (vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/7</math> (approx) and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[KlRo-p2]] (vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ||
** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/6</math> and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/6</math> and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). |
Revision as of 20:22, 9 August 2006
In a local co-ordinate chart, quasilinear wave equations (QNLW) take the form
One could also consider equations where the metric depends on derivatives of , but one can reduce to this case (giving up a derivative) by differentiating the equation. One can also reduce to the case , by a suitable change of variables. is usually quadratic in the derivatives , as this formulation is then robust under many types of changes of variables.
Specific equations
Quasilinear NLWs appear frequently in general relativity. Examples include
- The Einstein equations
- Equations of relativistic elasticity
- Equations of relativistic hydrodynamics
- The minimal surface equation
The most interesting dimension is of course the physical dimension d=3.
Wellposedness theory
Classically one has LWP for when (HuKaMar1977), but the [DNLW|semilinear theory] suggests that we should be able to improve this to with a null condition, and to without one (these results would be sharp even in the semilinear case). In principle Strichartz estimates should be able to push down to , but only partial results of this type are known. Specifically:
- When one has LWP in the expected range without a null condition (SmTt-p).
- When one has LWP for SmhTt-p (using parametrices and the equation for the metric); in the specific case of the Einstein equations see KlRo-p3, KlRo-p4, KlRo-p5 (using vector fields and the equation for the metric)
A special type of QNLW is the cubic equations, where the metric g itself obeys an elliptic equation of the form Delta , and the non-linearity is of the form . For such equations, we have LWP for when BaCh-p, BaCh2002. This equation has some similarity with the differentiated wave maps equation in the Coulomb gauge.
For small smooth compactly supported data of size and smooth non-linearities, the GWP theory for QNLW is as follows.
- If the non-linearity is a null form, then one has GWP for ; in fact one can take the data in a weighted Sobolev space Cd1986.
- Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 Kl1985b, and this is sharp Jo1981, Si1983
- In the semi-linear case and when the nonlinearity is quadratic in the derivatives, this is also true outside of a compact non-trapping obstacle KeSmhSo-p2. This has been generalized to the quasi-linear case in KeSmhSo-p3 (and non-linear Dirichlet wave equations are also treated there, as are multiple speeds).
- With a null structure and outside a star-shaped obstacle with Dirichlet conditions and , one has GWP for small data in which are compatible with the boundary [KeSmhSo-p]. Earlier work in this direction is in Dt1990.
- For radial data and obstacle this was obtained in Go1995; see also Ha1995, Ha2000.
- In the semilinear case, the non-trapping condition was removed in MetSo-p, even in the multiple speed case, provided one has an exponential decay result near the obstacle (this is true, for instance, if the obstacle is a union of a finite number of sufficiently separated strictly convex bodies).
- For or for cubic nonlinearities one has GWP regardless of the null structure KlPo1983, Sa1982, Kl1985b.
- In three dimensions with a null structure, for systems with multiple wave speeds, one has GWP So2001
- In the exterior of an nontrapping obstacle with Dirichlet conditions, with multiple speeds, one has GWP for sufficiently smooth and decaying data obeying the usual compatibility conditions at the boundary MetSo-p2, if the quasilinear terms obey some symmetry conditions and the semilinear terms are quadratic in
- Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 Kl1985b, and this is sharp Jo1981, Si1983