Help talk:Bibliographic naming conventions: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? [[User:Tao|Terry]] 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT) | the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? [[User:Tao|Terry]] 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
[[User:Pblue|Pieter Blue]] has suggested that preprints be numbered with year of release and capital letter, e.g. | [[User:Pblue|Pieter Blue]] has suggested that preprints be numbered with year of release and capital letter, e.g. "Au-p" becomes "Au2006A", "Au2006B", etc. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:28, 4 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:42, 14 August 2006
The legacy conventions are a little ad hoc (especially the assigning of codes to authors), and the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? Terry 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT)
Pieter Blue has suggested that preprints be numbered with year of release and capital letter, e.g. "Au-p" becomes "Au2006A", "Au2006B", etc. Terry 00:28, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
