Quadratic NLS: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]].
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [MurTao-p]. The <math>X^{s,b}\,</math> bilinear estimates fail for <math>H^{-3/4}\,</math> [[NaTkTs2001]].
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao-p]]. The <math>X^{s,b}\,</math> bilinear estimates fail for <math>H^{-3/4}\,</math> [[NaTkTs2001]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of  <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of  <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
* Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math>  thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
* If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math>  thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases.


[[Category:Equations]]
[[Category:Equations]]
Line 26: Line 26:
====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>====
====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>====


* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bo1993]]. In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p]
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bo1993]]. In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]]
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]].
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Line 40: Line 40:
* Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math>
* Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math>
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]].
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]].
** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p]
** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]]
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt-p]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt-p]].
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [MurTao-p].
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao-p]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]].
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases.


<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center>
Line 69: Line 69:
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]].
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]].
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases.


<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center>

Revision as of 00:14, 3 February 2007

Quadratic NLS

Equations of the form

which a quadratic function of its arguments are quadratic nonlinear Schrodinger equations.


Quadratic NLS on R

  • Scaling is
  • For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
    • This can be improved to the Besov space MurTao-p. The bilinear estimates fail for NaTkTs2001.
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
  • Since these equations do not have conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
  • If the non-linearity is then there is GWP in thanks to conservation, and ill-posedness below by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.

Quadratic NLS on

  • For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Bo1993. In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
  • In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.

Quadratic NLS on

  • Scaling
  • For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
    • In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to St1997, CoDeKnSt-p.
    • This can be improved to the Besov space MurTao-p.
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to Ta-p2.
  • In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
    • Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.

Quadratic NLS on T^2

  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for Gr-p2

Quadratic NLS on

  • Scaling is
  • For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to St1997, CoDeKnSt-p.
  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to Ta-p2.
  • In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
    • Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.

Quadratic NLS on

  • If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for Gr-p2