Quadratic NLS: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [MurTao-p]. The <math>X^{s,b}\,</math> bilinear estimates fail for <math>H^{-3/4}\,</math> [[NaTkTs2001]]. | ** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao-p]]. The <math>X^{s,b}\,</math> bilinear estimates fail for <math>H^{-3/4}\,</math> [[NaTkTs2001]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{u}u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
* Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * Since these equations do not have <math>L^2\,</math> conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
* If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math> thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | * If the non-linearity is <math>|u|u\,</math> then there is GWP in <math>L^2\,</math> thanks to <math>L^2\,</math> conservation, and ill-posedness below <math>L^2\,</math> by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>==== | ====Quadratic NLS on <math>T</math>==== | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bo1993]]. In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p] | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[Bo1993]]. In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]] | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>uu\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/2.\,</math> [[KnPoVe1996b]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math> | * Scaling <math>s_c = -1.\,</math> | ||
* For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | * For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]], [[Ts1987]]. | ||
** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [KnPoVe-p] | ** In the Hamiltonian case (<math>|u| u\,</math>) this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations [[KnPoVe-p]] | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt-p]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uu}\,</math> or <math>u u\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -3/4.\,</math> [[St1997]], [[CoDeKnSt-p]]. | ||
** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [MurTao-p]. | ** This can be improved to the Besov space <math>B^{-3/4}_{2,1}\,</math> [[MurTao-p]]. | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
* If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]]. | * If the quadratic non-linearity is of <math>u \underline{u}\,</math> type then one can push LWP to <math>s > -1/4.\,</math> [[Ta-p2]]. | ||
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | * In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u| u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data. | ||
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases. | ** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases. | ||
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> |
Revision as of 00:14, 3 February 2007
Quadratic NLS
Equations of the form
which a quadratic function of its arguments are quadratic nonlinear Schrodinger equations.
Quadratic NLS on R
- Scaling is
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- This can be improved to the Besov space MurTao-p. The bilinear estimates fail for NaTkTs2001.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- Since these equations do not have conservation it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
- If the non-linearity is then there is GWP in thanks to conservation, and ill-posedness below by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.
Quadratic NLS on
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for Bo1993. In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to KnPoVe1996b.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on
- Scaling
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- In the Hamiltonian case () this is sharp by Gallilean invariance considerations KnPoVe-p
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to St1997, CoDeKnSt-p.
- This can be improved to the Besov space MurTao-p.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to Ta-p2.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on T^2
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for Gr-p2
Quadratic NLS on
- Scaling is
- For any quadratic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990, Ts1987.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of or type then one can push LWP to St1997, CoDeKnSt-p.
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can push LWP to Ta-p2.
- In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Quadratic NLS on
- If the quadratic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for Gr-p2