Bilinear Airy estimates: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* The <math>-3/4+</math> estimate [[references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996]] on '''R'''<nowiki>:</nowiki> | * The <math>-3/4+</math> estimate [[references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996]] on '''R'''<nowiki>:</nowiki> | ||
<center><math>\| u\partial_x v | <center><math>\| u \partial_x v \|_{X^{-3/4+, -1/2+}} \lesssim \| u \|_{X^{-3/4+, 1/2+}} \| v \|_{X^{-3/4+, 1/2+}}</math></center> | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 28 July 2006
Algebraic identity
Much of the bilinear estimate theory for Airy equation rests on the following "three-wave resonance identity":
Estimates
The following bilinear estimates are known:
- The estimate references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996 on R:
- The above estimate fails at the endpoint . references.html#NaTkTs-p NaTkTs2001
- As a corollary of this estimate we have the -3/8+ estimate references.html#CoStTk1999 CoStTk1999 on R: If u and v have no low frequencies ( |\xi| <~ 1 ) then
- The -1/2 estimate references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996 on T: if u,v have mean zero, then for all s >= -1/2
- The above estimate fails for . Also, one cannot replace <math>1/2, -1/2 by 1/2+, -1/2+<math>. references.html#KnPoVe1996 KnPoVe1996
- This estimate also holds in the large period case if one is willing to lose a power of \lambda^{0+} in the constant. references.html#CoKeStTaTk-p2 CoKeStTkTa-p2
- Remark: In principle, a complete list of bilinear estimates could be obtained from [[references.html#Ta-p2 Ta-p2]].