|
|
Line 133: |
Line 133: |
|
| |
|
| the significance of this factor is that it behaves well under conformal compactification. See [[Bibliography#Aa2002|Aa2002]], [[Bibliography#BcKkZz2002|BcKkZz2002]], [[Bibliography#Gue2003|Gue2003]] for some recent results. | | the significance of this factor is that it behaves well under conformal compactification. See [[Bibliography#Aa2002|Aa2002]], [[Bibliography#BcKkZz2002|BcKkZz2002]], [[Bibliography#Gue2003|Gue2003]] for some recent results. |
| | |
| | A substantial [[scattering for NLW/NLKG|scattering theory for NLW and NLKG]] is known. |
|
| |
|
| The [[non-relativistic limit]] of NLKG has attracted a fair amount of research. | | The [[non-relativistic limit]] of NLKG has attracted a fair amount of research. |
|
| |
| [[Category:Equations]]
| |
|
| |
| ====Scattering theory for semilinear NLW====
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| [Thanks to Kenji Nakanishi for many helpful additions to this section - Ed.]
| |
|
| |
| The ''Strauss exponent''
| |
|
| |
| <center><math>p_0(d) = [d + 2 + \sqrt{d^2 + 12d + 4}]/2d</math></center>
| |
|
| |
| plays a key role in the GWP and scattering theory. We have <math>p_0(1) = [3+\sqrt{17}]/2</math>; <math>p_0(2) = 1+sqrt(2); p_0(3) = 2</math>; note that <math>p_0(d-1)</math> is always between the <math>L^2</math> and <math>H^{1/2}</math> critical powers, and <math>p_0(d)</math> is always between the <math>H^{1/2}</math> and <math>H^1</math> critical powers.
| |
|
| |
| Another key power is
| |
|
| |
| <center><math>p_*(d) = [d+2 + sqrt(d^2 + 8d)]/2(d-1)</math></center>
| |
|
| |
| which lies between the <math>L^2</math> critical power and <math>p_0(d-1)</math>.
| |
|
| |
| '''Caveats''': the <math>d=1,2</math> cases may be somewhat different from what is stated here (partly because some of the powers here are not well-defined). Also, in many of the NLW results one needs some additional decay at spatial infinity (e.g. finiteness of the conformal energy), except in the special <math>H^1</math>-critical case. This is because (unlike NLS and NLKG) there is no a priori bound on the <math>L^2</math> norm (even with conservation of energy).
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for small <math>H^1</math> data for arbitrary NLW:
| |
|
| |
| * Known for <math>p_*(d) < p \leq p_{H^{1/2}}</math> [[Bibliography#Sr1981|Sr1981]].
| |
| * For <math>p < p_0(d-1)</math> one has blow-up [[Bibliography#Si1984|Si1984]].
| |
| * When <math>d=3</math> this is extended to <math>5/2 < p \leq p_{H^{1/2}}</math>, but scattering fails for <math>p<5/2</math> [Hi-p3]
| |
| * When <math>d=4</math> this is extended to <math>p_0(d-1) = 2 < p < 5/2</math>, but scattering fails for <math>p<2</math> [Hi-p3]
| |
| * An alternate argument based on conformal compactification but giving slightly different results are in [[Bibliography#BcKkZz1999|BcKkZz1999]]
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for large <math>H^1</math> data for defocussing NLW:
| |
|
| |
| * Known for <math>p_{H^{1/2}} < p \leq p_{H^1}</math> [[Bibliography#BaSa1998|BaSa1998]], [[Bibliography#BaGd1997|BaGd1997]] (GWP was established earlier in [[Bibliography#GiVl1987|GiVl1987]]).
| |
| * Known for <math>p = p_{H^{1/2}}</math>, <math>d=3</math> [[Bibliography#BaeSgZz1990|BaeSgZz1990]]
| |
| * When <math>d=3</math> this is extended to <math>p_*(3) < p \leq p_{H^{1/2}}</math> [Hi-p3]
| |
| * When <math>d=4</math> this is extended to <math>p_*(4) < p < 5/2</math> [Hi-p3]
| |
| * For <math>d>4</math> one expects scattering when <math>p_0(d-1) < p \leq p_{H^{1/2}}</math>, but this is not known.
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for small smooth compactly supported data for arbitrary NLW:
| |
|
| |
| * GWP and scattering when <math>p > p_0(d-1)</math> [[Bibliography#GeLbSo1997|GeLbSo1997]]
| |
| ** For <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Bibliography#Jo1979|Jo1979]]
| |
| * Blow-up for arbitrary nonzero data when <math>p < p_0(d-1)</math> [[Bibliography#Si1984|Si1984]] (see also [[Bibliography#Rm1987|Rm1987]], [[Bibliography#JiZz2003|JiZz2003]]
| |
| ** For <math>d=4</math> this is in [[Bibliography#Gs1981b|Gs1981b]]
| |
| ** For <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Bibliography#Jo1979|Jo1979]]
| |
| * At the critical power <math>p = p_0(d-1)</math> there is blowup for non-negative non-trivial data [YoZgq-p2]
| |
| ** For <math>d=2,3</math> and arbitrary nonzero data this is in [[Bibliography#Scf1985|Scf1985]]
| |
| ** For large data and arbitrary <math>d</math> this is in [[Bibliography#Lev1990|Lev1990]]
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for small <math>H^1</math> data for arbitrary NLKG:
| |
|
| |
| * Decay estimates are known when <math>p_0(d) < p \leq p_{L^2}</math>[[Bibliography#MsSrWa1980|MsSrWa1980]], [[Bibliography#Br1984|Br1984]], [[Bibliography#Sr1981|Sr1981]], [[Bibliography#Pe1985|Pe1985]].
| |
| * Known when <math>p_{L^2} \leq p \leq p_{H^1}</math> [[Bibliography#Na1999c|Na1999c]], [[Bibliography#Na1999d|Na1999d]], [Na-p5]. Indeed, one has existence of wave operators and asymptotic completeness in these cases.
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for large <math>H^1</math> data for defocussing NLKG:
| |
|
| |
| * In this case one has an a priori <math>L^2</math> bound and one does not need decay at spatial infinity.
| |
| * Scattering is known for <math>p_{L^2} < p \leq p_{H^1}</math> [[Bibliography#Na1999c|Na1999c]], [[Bibliography#Na1999d|Na1999d]], [Na-p5]
| |
| ** For <math>d>2</math> and <math>p</math> not <math>H^1</math>-critical this is in [[Bibliography#Br1985|Br1985]] [[Bibliography#GiVl1985b|GiVl1985b]]
| |
| ** The <math>L^2</math>-critical case <math>p = p_{L^2}</math> is an interesting open problem.
| |
|
| |
| Scattering for small smooth compactly supported data for arbitrary NLKG:
| |
|
| |
| * GWP and scattering for <math>p > 1+2/d</math> when <math>d=1,2,3</math> [[Bibliography#LbSo1996|LbSo1996]]
| |
| ** When <math>d=1,2</math> this can be obtained by energy estimates and decay estimates.
| |
| ** In principle this extends to higher dimensions but there is a difficulty with lack of smoothness in the nonlinearity.
| |
| * Blowup in the non-Hamiltonian case when <math>p < 1+2/d</math> [[Bibliography#KeTa1999|KeTa1999]]. The endpoint <math>p=1+2/d</math> remains open but one probably also has blow-up here.
| |
| ** Failure of scattering for <math>p \leq 1+2/d</math> was shown in [[Bibliography#Gs1973|Gs1973]].
| |
|
| |
| An interesting (and apparently under-explored) problem is what happens to these global existence and scattering results when there is an obstacle. For [#nlw-5_on_R^3 NLW-5 on <math>R^3</math>] one has global regularity for convex obstacles [[Bibliography#SmhSo1995|SmhSo1995]], and for smooth non-linearities there is the [#gwp_qnlw general quasilinear theory]. If one adds a suitable damping term near the obstacle then one can recover some global existence results [[Bibliography#Nk2001|Nk2001]].
| |
|
| |
| On the Schwarzschild manifold some scattering and decay results for NLW and NLWKG can be found in [[Bibliography#BchNic1993|BchNic1993]], [[Bibliography#Nic1995|Nic1995]], [[Bibliography#BluSf2003|BluSf2003]]
| |
|
| |
|
| ====Specific semilinear wave equations==== | | ====Specific semilinear wave equations==== |
Line 218: |
Line 148: |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Wave]] | | [[Category:Wave]] |
| | [[Category:Equations]] |
Semilinear wave equations
[Note: Many references needed here!]
Semilinear wave equations (NLW) and semi-linear Klein-Gordon equations (NLKG) take the form
respectively where is a function only of and not of its derivatives, which vanishes to more than first order.
Typically grows like for some power . If is the gradient of some function , then we have a conserved Hamiltonian
For NLKG there is an additional term of in the integrand, which is useful for controlling the low frequencies of . If V is positive definite then we call the NLW defocussing; if is negative definite we call the NLW focussing. The term "coercive" does not have a standard definition, but generally denotes a potential which is positive for large values of .
To analyze these equations in we need the non-linearity to be sufficiently smooth. More precisely, we will always assume either that is smooth, or that is a p^th-power type non-linearity with .
The scaling regularity is . Notable powers of include the -critical power , the -critical or conformal power p_{H^{1/2}} = 1 + 4/(d-1), and the -critical power .
Dimension d
|
Strauss exponent (NLKG)
|
-critical exponent
|
Strauss exponent (NLW)
|
H^{1/2}-critical exponent
|
H^1-critical exponent
|
1
|
3.56155...
|
5
|
infinity
|
infinity
|
N/A
|
2
|
2.41421...
|
3
|
3.56155...
|
5
|
infinity
|
3
|
2
|
2.33333...
|
2.41421...
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
1.78078...
|
2
|
2
|
2.33333...
|
3
|
The following necessary conditions for LWP are known. Firstly, for focussing NLW/NLKG one has blowup in finite time for large data, as can be seen by the ODE method. One can scale this and obtain ill-posedness for any focussing NLW/NLKG in the supercritical regime s < s_c; this has been extended to the defocusing case in [CtCoTa-p2]. By using Lorentz scaling instead of isotropic scaling one can also obtain ill-posedness whenever s is below the conformal regularity
in the focusing case; the defocusing case is still open. In the -critical power or below, this condition is stronger than the scaling requirement.
- When and 1 < p < p_{H^{1/2}} with the focusing sign, blowup is known to occur when a certain Lyapunov functional is negative, and the rate of blowup is self-similar MeZaa2003; earlier results are in AntMe2001, CafFri1986, Al1995, KiLit1993, KiLit1993b.
To make sense of the non-linearity in the sense of distributions we need s \geq 0 (indeed we have illposedness below this regularity by a high-to-low cascade, see [CtCoTa-p2]). In the one-dimensional case one also needs the condition to keep the non-linearity integrable, because there is no Strichartz smoothing to exploit.
Finally, in three dimensions one has ill-posedness when and Lb1993.
- In dimensions d\leq3 the above necessary conditions are also sufficient for LWP.
- For d>4 sufficiency is only known assuming the condition
(*)
and excluding the double endpoint when (*) holds with equality and s=s_{conf} Ta1999. The main tool is two-scale Strichartz estimates.
- By using standard Strichartz estimates this was proven with (*) replaced by
; (**)
see KeTa1998 for the double endpoint when (**) holds with equality and s=s_{conf}, and LbSo1995 for all other cases. A slightly weaker result also appears in Kp1994.
GWP and scattering for NLW is known for data with small norm when is at or above the -critical power (and this has been extended to Besov spaces; see [Pl-p4]. This can be used to obtain self-similar solutions, see [MiaZg-p2]). One also has GWP in in the defocussing case when p is at or below the -critical power. (At the critical power this result is due to Gl1992; see also SaSw1994. For radial data this was shown in Sw1988). For more scattering results, see below.
For the defocussing NLKG, GWP in , , is known in the following cases:
- references:KnPoVe-p2 KnPoVe-p2
- [MiaZgFg-p]
- , and
[MiaZgFg-p]. Note that this is the range of p for which s_conf obeys both the scaling condition and the condition (**).
- [Fo-p]; this is for the NLW instead of NLKG.
- [Fo-p]; this is for the NLW instead of NLKG.
GWP and blowup has also been studied for the NLW with a conformal factor
;
the significance of this factor is that it behaves well under conformal compactification. See Aa2002, BcKkZz2002, Gue2003 for some recent results.
A substantial scattering theory for NLW and NLKG is known.
The non-relativistic limit of NLKG has attracted a fair amount of research.
Specific semilinear wave equations