Cubic DNLS on R: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (More bib cleaning) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** For s <font face="Symbol">³</font> 1 this was proven in [[Bibliography#HaOz1994|HaOz1994]]. | ** For s <font face="Symbol">³</font> 1 this was proven in [[Bibliography#HaOz1994|HaOz1994]]. | ||
* GWP for s>1/2 and small L<sup>2</sup> norm [[Bibliography#CoKeStTkTa2002b|CoKeStTkTa2002b]]. The s=1/2 case remains open. | * GWP for s>1/2 and small L<sup>2</sup> norm [[Bibliography#CoKeStTkTa2002b|CoKeStTkTa2002b]]. The s=1/2 case remains open. | ||
** for s>2/3 and small | ** for <math> s>2/3</math> and small <math>L^2</math> norm this was proven in [[Bibliography#CoKeStTkTa2001b|CoKeStTkTa2001b]]. | ||
** For s > 32/33 with small | ** For <math>s > 32/33</math> with small <math>L^2</math> norm this was proven in [[Bibliography#Tk-p |Tk-p]]. | ||
** For s | ** For <math>s >1</math> and small norm this was proven in [[Bibliography#HaOz1994|HaOz1994]]. One can also handle certain pure power additional terms [[Bibliography#Oz1996|Oz1996]]. | ||
** The small | ** The small <math>L^2</math> norm condition is required in order to gauge transform the problem; see [[Bibliography#HaOz1993|HaOz1993]], [[Bibliography#Oz1996|Oz1996]]. | ||
* Solutions do not scatter to free Schrodinger solutions. In the focussing case this can be easily seen from the existence of solitons. But even in the defocussing case wave operators do not exist, and must be replaced by modified wave operators (constructed in [[Bibliography#HaOz1994|HaOz1994]] for small data). | * Solutions do not scatter to free Schrodinger solutions. In the focussing case this can be easily seen from the existence of solitons. But even in the defocussing case wave operators do not exist, and must be replaced by modified wave operators (constructed in [[Bibliography#HaOz1994|HaOz1994]] for small data). | ||
This equation has the same scaling as the [#Quintic_NLS_on_R quintic NLS], and there is a certain gauge invariance which unifies the two (together with an additional nonlinear term u <u>u</u><sub>x</sub> u). | This equation has the same scaling as the [#Quintic_NLS_on_R quintic NLS], and there is a certain gauge invariance which unifies the two (together with an additional nonlinear term u <u>u</u><sub>x</sub> u). | ||
For non-linearities of the form f = a (u | For non-linearities of the form <math>f = a (u {\overline{u}})_x u + b (u \overline{u})_x u_x</math> one can obtain GWP for small data [[Bibliography#KyTs1995|KyTs1995]] for arbitrary complex constants <math>a, b</math>. See also [[Bibliography#Ts1994|Ts1994]]. | ||
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> | <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"><center> |
Revision as of 13:35, 1 August 2006
Cubic DNLS on
Suppose the non-linearity has the form f = i (u u u)x. Then:
- Scaling is sc = 0.
- LWP for s ³ 1/2 Tk-p.
- GWP for s>1/2 and small L2 norm CoKeStTkTa2002b. The s=1/2 case remains open.
- for and small norm this was proven in CoKeStTkTa2001b.
- For with small norm this was proven in Tk-p.
- For and small norm this was proven in HaOz1994. One can also handle certain pure power additional terms Oz1996.
- The small norm condition is required in order to gauge transform the problem; see HaOz1993, Oz1996.
- Solutions do not scatter to free Schrodinger solutions. In the focussing case this can be easily seen from the existence of solitons. But even in the defocussing case wave operators do not exist, and must be replaced by modified wave operators (constructed in HaOz1994 for small data).
This equation has the same scaling as the [#Quintic_NLS_on_R quintic NLS], and there is a certain gauge invariance which unifies the two (together with an additional nonlinear term u ux u).
For non-linearities of the form one can obtain GWP for small data KyTs1995 for arbitrary complex constants . See also Ts1994.