QNLW: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<center><math>\partial_\alpha g^{\alpha\beta}(u) \partial_\beta u = F(u, Du)</math>.</center> | <center><math>\partial_\alpha g^{\alpha\beta}(u) \partial_\beta u = F(u, Du)</math>.</center> | ||
One could also consider equations where the metric depends on derivatives of u, but one can reduce to this case (giving up a derivative) by differentiating the equation. One can also reduce to the case g^{00} = 1, g^{0i} = g^{i0} = 0 by a suitable change of variables. F is usually quadratic in the derivatives Du, as this formulation is then robust under many types of changes of variables. | One could also consider equations where the metric depends on derivatives of <math>u</math>, but one can reduce to this case (giving up a derivative) by differentiating the equation. One can also reduce to the case <math>g^{00} = 1</math>, <math>g^{0i} = g^{i0} = 0</math> by a suitable change of variables. <math>F</math> is usually quadratic in the derivatives <math>Du</math>, as this formulation is then robust under many types of changes of variables. | ||
== Specific equations == | == Specific equations == | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Wellposedness theory == | == Wellposedness theory == | ||
Classically one has LWP for H^s when s > d/2+1 ([[HuKaMar1977]]), but the [DNLW|semilinear theory] suggests that we should be able to improve this to s > s_c = d/2 with a null condition, and to s > d/2 + max(1/2, (d-5)/4) without one (these results would be sharp even in the semilinear case). In principle Strichartz estimates should be able to push down to s > d/2 + 1/2, but only partial results of this type are known. Specifically: | Classically one has LWP for <math>H^s</math> when <math>s > d/2+1</math> ([[HuKaMar1977]]), but the [DNLW|semilinear theory] suggests that we should be able to improve this to <math>s > s_c = d/2</math> with a null condition, and to <math>s > d/2 + max(1/2, (d-5)/4)</math> without one (these results would be sharp even in the semilinear case). In principle Strichartz estimates should be able to push down to <math>s > d/2 + 1/2</math>, but only partial results of this type are known. Specifically: | ||
* When d=2 one has LWP in the expected range s > d/2 + 3/4 without a null condition ([[SmTt-p]]). | * When <math>d=2</math> one has LWP in the expected range <math>s > d/2 + 3/4</math> without a null condition ([[SmTt-p]]). | ||
** For s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/12 this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/12</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ||
** For s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/8 this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 3/4 + 1/8</math> this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). | ||
* When d=3,4,5 one has LWP for s > d/2 + 1/2 [[SmTt-p]] (using parametrices and the equation for the metric); in the specific case of the [[Einstein equations]] see [[KlRo-p3]], [[KlRo-p4]], [[KlRo-p5]] (using vector fields and the equation for the metric) | * When <math>d=3,4,5</math> one has LWP for <math>s > d/2 + 1/2</math> [[SmTt-p]] (using parametrices and the equation for the metric); in the specific case of the [[Einstein equations]] see [[KlRo-p3]], [[KlRo-p4]], [[KlRo-p5]] (using vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ||
** For s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/7 (approx) and d=3 this is in [[KlRo-p2]] (vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/7</math> (approx) and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[KlRo-p2]] (vector fields and the equation for the metric) | ||
** For s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/6 and d=3 this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/6</math> and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Tt-p5]] (using the FBI transform). | ||
** For s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/5 (approx) and d=3 this is in [[Kl-p2]] (vector fields methods). | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/5</math> (approx) and <math>d=3</math> this is in [[Kl-p2]] (vector fields methods). | ||
** For s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/4 and d\geq 3 this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). See also [[BaCh1999b]]. | ** For <math>s > d/2 + 1/2 + 1/4</math> and <math>d \geq 3</math> this is in [[BaCh1999]] (using FIOs) and [[Tt2000]] (using the FBI transform). See also [[BaCh1999b]]. | ||
A special type of QNLW is the cubic equations, where the metric g itself obeys an elliptic equation of the form Delta g = |Du|^2, and the non-linearity is of the form Dg Du. For such equations, we have LWP for s > d/2 + 1/6 when d \geq 4 [[BaCh-p]], [[BaCh2002]]. This equation has some similarity with the differentiated [[wave maps|wave maps equation]] in the Coulomb gauge. | A special type of QNLW is the cubic equations, where the metric g itself obeys an elliptic equation of the form Delta <math>g = |Du|^2</math>, and the non-linearity is of the form <math>Dg Du</math>. For such equations, we have LWP for <math>s > d/2 + 1/6</math> when <math>d \geq 4</math> [[BaCh-p]], [[BaCh2002]]. This equation has some similarity with the differentiated [[wave maps|wave maps equation]] in the Coulomb gauge. | ||
For small smooth compactly supported data of size <math>\epsilon</math> and smooth non-linearities, the GWP theory for QNLW is as follows. | For small smooth compactly supported data of size <math>\epsilon</math> and smooth non-linearities, the GWP theory for QNLW is as follows. | ||
* If the non-linearity is a null form, then one has GWP for d\geq3; in fact one can take the data in a weighted Sobolev space H^{4,3} x H^{3,4} [[Cd1986]]. | * If the non-linearity is a null form, then one has GWP for <math>d\geq3</math>; in fact one can take the data in a weighted Sobolev space <math>H^{4,3} x H^{3,4}</math> [[Cd1986]]. | ||
** Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 [[Kl1985b]], and this is sharp [[Jo1981]], [[Si1983]] | ** Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 [[Kl1985b]], and this is sharp [[Jo1981]], [[Si1983]] | ||
*** In the semi-linear case and when the nonlinearity is quadratic in the derivatives, this is also true outside of a compact non-trapping obstacle [[KeSmhSo-p2]]. This has been generalized to the quasi-linear case in [[KeSmhSo-p3]] (and non-linear Dirichlet wave equations are also treated there, as are multiple speeds). | *** In the semi-linear case and when the nonlinearity is quadratic in the derivatives, this is also true outside of a compact non-trapping obstacle [[KeSmhSo-p2]]. This has been generalized to the quasi-linear case in [[KeSmhSo-p3]] (and non-linear Dirichlet wave equations are also treated there, as are multiple speeds). | ||
** With a null structure and outside a star-shaped obstacle with Dirichlet conditions and d=3, one has GWP for small data in H^{9,8} | ** With a null structure and outside a star-shaped obstacle with Dirichlet conditions and <math>d=3</math>, one has GWP for small data in <math>H^{9,8} \times H^{8,9}</math> which are compatible with the boundary [KeSmhSo-p]. Earlier work in this direction is in [[Dt1990]]. | ||
*** For radial data and obstacle this was obtained in [[Go1995]]; see also [[Ha1995]], [[Ha2000]]. | *** For radial data and obstacle this was obtained in [[Go1995]]; see also [[Ha1995]], [[Ha2000]]. | ||
*** In the semilinear case, the non-trapping condition was removed in [[MetSo-p]], even in the multiple speed case, provided one has an exponential decay result near the obstacle (this is true, for instance, if the obstacle is a union of a finite number of sufficiently separated strictly convex bodies). | *** In the semilinear case, the non-trapping condition was removed in [[MetSo-p]], even in the multiple speed case, provided one has an exponential decay result near the obstacle (this is true, for instance, if the obstacle is a union of a finite number of sufficiently separated strictly convex bodies). | ||
** For d>3 or for cubic nonlinearities one has GWP regardless of the null structure [[KlPo1983]], [[Sa1982]], [[Kl1985b]]. | ** For <math>d>3</math> or for cubic nonlinearities one has GWP regardless of the null structure [[KlPo1983]], [[Sa1982]], [[Kl1985b]]. | ||
*** In three dimensions with a null structure, for systems with multiple wave speeds, one has GWP [[So2001]] | *** In three dimensions with a null structure, for systems with multiple wave speeds, one has GWP [[So2001]] | ||
*** In the exterior of an nontrapping obstacle with Dirichlet conditions, with multiple speeds, one has GWP for sufficiently smooth and decaying data obeying the usual compatibility conditions at the boundary [[MetSo-p2]], if the quasilinear terms obey some symmetry conditions and the semilinear terms are quadratic in Du | *** In the exterior of an nontrapping obstacle with Dirichlet conditions, with multiple speeds, one has GWP for sufficiently smooth and decaying data obeying the usual compatibility conditions at the boundary [[MetSo-p2]], if the quasilinear terms obey some symmetry conditions and the semilinear terms are quadratic in <math>Du</math> | ||
***# When the obstacle is a ball this is in [[Ha1995]]. | ***# When the obstacle is a ball this is in [[Ha1995]]. | ||
***# For d \geq 6 outside of a starshaped obstacle this is in [[ShbTs1984]], [[ShbTs1986]]. | ***# For <math>d \geq 6</math> outside of a starshaped obstacle this is in [[ShbTs1984]], [[ShbTs1986]]. | ||
[[Category:Wave]] | [[Category:Wave]] | ||
[[Category:Equations]] | [[Category:Equations]] |
Revision as of 20:34, 3 August 2006
In a local co-ordinate chart, quasilinear wave equations (QNLW) take the form
One could also consider equations where the metric depends on derivatives of , but one can reduce to this case (giving up a derivative) by differentiating the equation. One can also reduce to the case , by a suitable change of variables. is usually quadratic in the derivatives , as this formulation is then robust under many types of changes of variables.
Specific equations
Quasilinear NLWs appear frequently in general relativity. Examples include
- The Einstein equations
- Equations of relativistic elasticity
- Equations of relativistic hydrodynamics
- The minimal surface equation
The most interesting dimension is of course the physical dimension d=3.
Wellposedness theory
Classically one has LWP for when (HuKaMar1977), but the [DNLW|semilinear theory] suggests that we should be able to improve this to with a null condition, and to without one (these results would be sharp even in the semilinear case). In principle Strichartz estimates should be able to push down to , but only partial results of this type are known. Specifically:
- When one has LWP in the expected range without a null condition (SmTt-p).
- When one has LWP for SmTt-p (using parametrices and the equation for the metric); in the specific case of the Einstein equations see KlRo-p3, KlRo-p4, KlRo-p5 (using vector fields and the equation for the metric)
A special type of QNLW is the cubic equations, where the metric g itself obeys an elliptic equation of the form Delta , and the non-linearity is of the form . For such equations, we have LWP for when BaCh-p, BaCh2002. This equation has some similarity with the differentiated wave maps equation in the Coulomb gauge.
For small smooth compactly supported data of size and smooth non-linearities, the GWP theory for QNLW is as follows.
- If the non-linearity is a null form, then one has GWP for ; in fact one can take the data in a weighted Sobolev space Cd1986.
- Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 Kl1985b, and this is sharp Jo1981, Si1983
- In the semi-linear case and when the nonlinearity is quadratic in the derivatives, this is also true outside of a compact non-trapping obstacle KeSmhSo-p2. This has been generalized to the quasi-linear case in KeSmhSo-p3 (and non-linear Dirichlet wave equations are also treated there, as are multiple speeds).
- With a null structure and outside a star-shaped obstacle with Dirichlet conditions and , one has GWP for small data in which are compatible with the boundary [KeSmhSo-p]. Earlier work in this direction is in Dt1990.
- For radial data and obstacle this was obtained in Go1995; see also Ha1995, Ha2000.
- In the semilinear case, the non-trapping condition was removed in MetSo-p, even in the multiple speed case, provided one has an exponential decay result near the obstacle (this is true, for instance, if the obstacle is a union of a finite number of sufficiently separated strictly convex bodies).
- For or for cubic nonlinearities one has GWP regardless of the null structure KlPo1983, Sa1982, Kl1985b.
- In three dimensions with a null structure, for systems with multiple wave speeds, one has GWP So2001
- In the exterior of an nontrapping obstacle with Dirichlet conditions, with multiple speeds, one has GWP for sufficiently smooth and decaying data obeying the usual compatibility conditions at the boundary MetSo-p2, if the quasilinear terms obey some symmetry conditions and the semilinear terms are quadratic in
- Without the null structure, one has almost GWP in d=3 Kl1985b, and this is sharp Jo1981, Si1983