Maxwell-Schrodinger system: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) m (Maxwell equations were not correct) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center> | <center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center> | ||
<center><math> | <center><math>\partial^aF_{ab} = J_b\,</math></center> | ||
where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by | where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by |
Revision as of 13:08, 24 July 2007
Maxwell-Schrodinger system in
This system is a partially non-relativistic analogue of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system, coupling a U(1) connection with a complex scalar field u; it is thus an example of a wave-Schrodinger system. The Lagrangian density is
giving rise to the system of PDE
where the current density is given by
As with the MKG system, there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorentz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).
Let us place u in , and A in The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be
- In the Lorentz and Temporal gauges, one has LWP for and [NkrWad-p]
- For smooth data () in the Lorentz gauge this is in NkTs1986 (this result works in all dimensions)
- Global weak solutions are known in the energy class () in the Lorentz and Coulomb gauges GuoNkSr1996. GWP is still open however.
- Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [GiVl-p3], [GiVl-p5]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
- A similar result for small data is in Ts1993
- In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known Ts1995
- In two dimensions, GWP for smooth solutions is known TsNk1985