Critical

From DispersiveWiki
Revision as of 19:43, 5 August 2006 by Tao (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

In the theory of nonlinear PDE, we use the terms sub-critical, critical, and super-critical to denote a significant transition in the behaviour of a particular equation with respect to a specified regularity class (or conserved quantity). Typically, subcritical equations behave in an approximately linear manner, supercritical equation behave in a highly nonlinear manner, and critical equations are very finely balanced between the two.

This distinction into sub-critical, critical, and super-critical behaviour can be made in several contexts:

  • Given a fixed equation with a scale invariance (or approximate scale invariance), one can classify various quantities (such as homogeneous Sobolev norms , or various conserved quantities) as sub-critical, critical, or super-critical with respect to this scaling invariance. Example: In the cubic NLS on R^3, the energy or norm is sub-critical, the momentum or norm is critical, and the mass or norm is super-critical.
  • Conversely, given a fixed regularity class or conserved quantity, one can classify an equation as sub-critical, critical, or super-critical with respect to that class or quantity. Example: the NLW and NLS on is energy-subcritical for , energy-critical for , and energy-supercritical for .
  • Occasionally one also discusses the sub-criticality, criticality, or super-criticality of regularities with respect to other symmetries than scaling, such as Galilean invariance or Lorentz invariance.
  • When analyzing the long-time asymptotics of nonlinear equations with data which is small and highly

localized, one can distinguish equations into scattering-subcritical (short-range), scattering-critical (critical-range), and scattering-supercritical (long-range) classes; this measures the relative asymptotic strength of the nonlinear and linear components of the equation, and is generally unrelated to the distinction arising from scale invariance or other symmetries. Example: The NLS on is scattering-subcritical for , scattering-critical for , and scattering-supercritical for .

  • In focusing equations with a critical conserved quantity (e.g. mass), the behavior for small values of this quantity is often quite different from that at large values. In many equations there is a critical value of this quantity, below which linear-type behavior is expected, and above which nonlinear behavior can occur. (When one is exactly at the critical value, soliton-type behavior is very typical.) Example: in a mass critical NLS, masses less than the mass

Criticality with respect to scaling

A large number of equations studied here enjoy a scale invariance, which typically takes a form such as

where the scaling parameter is arbitrary, and are constants (with positive) which depend on the various parameters of the equation (the linear and nonlinear components of the equation, and the ambient dimension). Thus any given solution $u$ has fine-scale counterparts with , as well as coarse-scale counterparts with . Typically, the fine-scale counterparts are rapidly oscillating, highly concentrated, and can exhibit nonlinear behaviour in short amounts of time, whereas the coarse-scale counterparts are very smooth, spread out over large regions of space and time, and behave linearly for long periods of time.

Many quantities associated to a solution, such as a spatial norm (e.g. ), a spacetime norm (e.g. ), or a conserved quantity (e.g. could be mass, momentum, or energy) transform in a simple manner under the above scale invariance. Indeed, if is ``homogeneous, then we obtain a relationship of the form

for some constant which depends on the scaling symmetry and on the degree of homogeneity of ; from a dimensional analysis perspective, measures the dimension of in terms of the unit of length (which is represented here by ). For instance, for the NLS, the mass

interacts with the scaling invariance via the formula

so in this case . The sign of is then used to classify the quantity :

  • If , then the fine-scaled copy has a much larger value of than the original solution . Hence, if we are keeping the value of fixed, then we do not expect fine-scale behavior to occur, while conversely we expect plenty of coarse-scale behavior. In this case we say that the quantity is sub-critical for this equation, or equivalently that the equation is sub-critical with respect to this quantity.
  • If , then the fine-scaled copy has a much smaller value of than the original solution . Hence, if we are keeping the value of fixed, then we expect a substantial amount of fine-scale behavior to occur, though conversely we do not expect much coarse-scale behavior. In this case we say that the quantity is super-critical for this equation, or equivalently that the equation is super-critical with respect to this quantity.
  • If , then is scale-invariant, and so for a fixed value of we expect the same behavior at all scales. In this case we say that the quantity is critical for this equation, or equivalently that the equation is super-critical with respect to this quantity.

The behavior of an equation at short and long time scales, and at given levels of regularity, is often controlled by the distinction into sub-critical, critical, and super-critical quantities via the scaling heuristic.

Criticality with respect to other symmetries

To be written...

Criticality with respect to scattering

To be written...

Critical values of mass and energy

To be written...