Help talk:Bibliographic naming conventions: Difference between revisions
From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The legacy conventions are a little ad hoc (especially the assigning of codes to authors), and | The legacy conventions are a little ad hoc (especially the assigning of codes to authors), and | ||
the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? [[User:Tao|Terry]] 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT) | the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? [[User:Tao|Terry]] 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
[[User:Pblue|Pieter Blue]] has suggested that preprints be numbered with year of release and capital letter, e.g. [[Au-p]] becomes [[Au2006A]], [[Au2006B]], etc. [[User:Tao|Terry]] 00:28, 4 August 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:28, 4 August 2006
The legacy conventions are a little ad hoc (especially the assigning of codes to authors), and the need to accomodate preprints is a little ugly. Anyone have any suggestions for improvements? Terry 14:25, 30 July 2006 (EDT)
Pieter Blue has suggested that preprints be numbered with year of release and capital letter, e.g. Au-p becomes Au2006A, Au2006B, etc. Terry 00:28, 4 August 2006 (EDT)
