Non-relativistic limit

The non-relativistic limit of a relativistic equation (which thus involves the speed of light 'c') denotes the limit when $c\to \infty$ . It is the opposite of the vanishing dispersion limit.

Non-relativistic limit of NLKG

By inserting a parameter $c$ (the speed of light), one can rewrite the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation as

u_{tt}/c^{2}-\Delta u+c^{2}u+f(u)=0

.

One can then ask for what happens in the non-relativistic limit $c\rightarrow \infty$ (keeping the initial position fixed, and dealing with the initial velocity appropriately). In Fourier space, $u$ should be localized near the double hyperboloid

t=\pm c{\sqrt {c^{2}+x^{2}}}

.

In the non-relativistic limit this becomes two paraboloids

t=\pm (c^{2}+x^{2}/2)

and so one expects $u$ to resolve as

u=exp(ic^{2}t)v_{+}+exp(-ic^{2}t)v_{-}

u_{t}=ic^{2}exp(ic^{2}t)v_{+}-ic^{2}exp(ic^{2}t)v_{-}

where $v_{+}$ , $v_{-}$ solve some suitable NLS.

A special case arises if one assumes $(u_{t}-ic^{2}u)$ to be small at time zero (say $o(c)$ in some Sobolev norm). Then one expects $v_{-}$ to vanish and to get a scalar NLS. Many results of this nature exist, see Mac-p, Nj1990, Ts1984, MacNaOz-p, Na-p. In more general situations one expects $v_{+}$ and $v_{-}$ to evolve by a coupled NLS; see MasNa2002.

Heuristically, the frequency $\ll c$ portion of the evolution should evolve in a Schrodinger-type manner, while the frequency $\gg c$ portion of the evolution should evolve in a wave-type manner. (This is consistent with physical intuition, since frequency is proportional to momentum, and hence (in the nonrelativistic regime) to velocity).

A similar non-relativistic limit result holds for the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system (in the Coulomb gauge), where the limiting equation is a coupled Schrodinger-Poisson system under reasonable $H^{1}$ hypotheses on the initial data BecMauSb-p. The asymptotic relation between the MKG-CG fields $f$ , $A$ , $A_{0}$ and the Schrodinger-Poisson fields u, v^+, v^- are