Talk:Hartree equation: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details.  [[User:Tao|Terry]] 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details.  [[User:Tao|Terry]] 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
----
As a physicist I am somewhat unfamiliar with this form of Hartree equation. The reason for this is that this equation is about many-body problems (e.g. large atoms). This means that one has to consider many-body wavefunctions like
<math>
u=\phi_1(x_1)\phi_2(x_2)...\phi_n(x_n).
</math>
The modification due to Fock to the Hartree method is to use fully antisymmetric wavefunctions as happens to fermionic matter represented by a determinat (Slater determinant). This introduces a further term into the equation due to the particle exchange (exchange integral). --[[User:Jonlester|Jonlester]] 18:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 22:03, 9 July 2007

There is apparently a connection between the Hartree equation and the Hartree-Fock equation, but I unfortunately am not aware of the details. Terry 13:32, 9 July 2007 (EDT)


As a physicist I am somewhat unfamiliar with this form of Hartree equation. The reason for this is that this equation is about many-body problems (e.g. large atoms). This means that one has to consider many-body wavefunctions like

The modification due to Fock to the Hartree method is to use fully antisymmetric wavefunctions as happens to fermionic matter represented by a determinat (Slater determinant). This introduces a further term into the equation due to the particle exchange (exchange integral). --Jonlester 18:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)