Vlasov-Maxwell equation: Difference between revisions
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) m (This is the proper revision) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Vlasov-Maxwell equations''' equations are given by | The '''Vlasov-Maxwell equations''' equations are given by | ||
:<math>f_t + \underline{v} \cdot \nabla_x f + (E + \underline{v} \times B) \cdot \ | :<math>f_t + \underline{v} \cdot \nabla_x f + (E + \underline{v} \times B) \cdot \nabla_{\underline{v}} f = 0 </math> | ||
:<math>\nabla \cdot E = 4 \pi \rho </math> | :<math>\nabla \cdot E = 4 \pi \rho </math> | ||
:<math>\nabla \cdot B = 0 </math> | :<math>\nabla \cdot B = 0 </math> | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:<math>B_t = - \nabla \times E</math> | :<math>B_t = - \nabla \times E</math> | ||
where <math>f(t,x,v)</math> is the particle density (and is non-negative), <math>j(t,x) = \int \underline{v} f(t,x,v) dv</math> is the current density, <math>\rho(t,x) = \int f(t,x,v) dv</math> is the charge density, and <math>\underline{v} = v / (1 + |v|^2)^{1/2}</math> is the relativistic velocity. The vector fields E(t,x) and B(t,x) represent the electromagnetic field. x and v live in R^3 and t lives in R. This equation is a coupled wave and conservation law system, and models collision-less plasma at relativistic velocities. | where <math>f(t,x,\underline{v})</math> is the particle density (and is non-negative), <math>j(t,x) = \int \underline{v} f(t,x,\underline{v}) dv</math> is the current density, <math>\rho(t,x) = \int f(t,x,\underline{v}) dv</math> is the charge density, and <math>\underline{v} = v / (1 + |v|^2)^{1/2}</math> is the relativistic velocity. The vector fields E(t,x) and B(t,x) represent the electromagnetic field. x and v live in R^3 and t lives in R. This equation is a coupled wave and conservation law system, and models collision-less plasma at relativistic velocities. | ||
Assuming that the particle density remains compactly supported in the velocity domain for all time, GWP in C^1 was proven in [GsSr1986b] (see also [GsSr1986], [GsSr1987]. | Assuming that the particle density remains compactly supported in the velocity domain for all time, GWP in C^1 was proven in [[GsSr1986b]] (see also [[GsSr1986]], [[GsSr1987]]. | ||
An alternate proof of this result is in [KlSt2002]. A stronger result (which only imposes compact support conditions on the initial data, not on all time) regarding solutions to Vlasov-Maxwell which are purely outgoing (no incoming radiation) is in [Cal-p]. | An alternate proof of this result is in [[KlSt2002]]. A stronger result (which only imposes compact support conditions on the initial data, not on all time) regarding solutions to Vlasov-Maxwell which are purely outgoing (no incoming radiation) is in [[Cal-p]]. | ||
The velocity demain hypothesis can be removed in the "2.5 dimensional model" where the x_3 dependence is trivial but the v_3 dependence is not [GsScf1990]. | The velocity demain hypothesis can be removed in the "2.5 dimensional model" where the x_3 dependence is trivial but the v_3 dependence is not [GsScf1990]. | ||
Further results are in [GsSch1988], [Rei1990], [Wol1984], [Scf1986] | Further results are in [[GsSch1988]], [[Rei1990]], [[Wol1984]], [[Scf1986]] | ||
The non-relativistic limit of Vlasov-Maxwell is Vlasov-Poisson, in which the electromagnetic field <math>E + v \times B</math> is replaced by | The non-relativistic limit of Vlasov-Maxwell is Vlasov-Poisson, in which the electromagnetic field <math>E + v \times B</math> is replaced by | ||
<math>\nabla \Delta^{-1} 4 \pi \rho</math>. Considerably more is known for the existence theory of this equation. | <math>\nabla \Delta^{-1} 4 \pi \rho</math>. Considerably more is known for the existence theory of this equation. |
Revision as of 13:23, 11 July 2007
The Vlasov-Maxwell equations equations are given by
where is the particle density (and is non-negative), is the current density, is the charge density, and is the relativistic velocity. The vector fields E(t,x) and B(t,x) represent the electromagnetic field. x and v live in R^3 and t lives in R. This equation is a coupled wave and conservation law system, and models collision-less plasma at relativistic velocities.
Assuming that the particle density remains compactly supported in the velocity domain for all time, GWP in C^1 was proven in GsSr1986b (see also GsSr1986, GsSr1987. An alternate proof of this result is in KlSt2002. A stronger result (which only imposes compact support conditions on the initial data, not on all time) regarding solutions to Vlasov-Maxwell which are purely outgoing (no incoming radiation) is in Cal-p. The velocity demain hypothesis can be removed in the "2.5 dimensional model" where the x_3 dependence is trivial but the v_3 dependence is not [GsScf1990]. Further results are in GsSch1988, Rei1990, Wol1984, Scf1986 The non-relativistic limit of Vlasov-Maxwell is Vlasov-Poisson, in which the electromagnetic field is replaced by . Considerably more is known for the existence theory of this equation.