Dirac equations: Difference between revisions
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) (Defined Dirac operator) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article describes several equations named after [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dirac Paul Dirac]. | This article describes several equations named after [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Dirac Paul Dirac]. | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
==Dirac operator== | |||
Given a Clifford algebra ''Cℓ''<sub>''p'',''q''</sub>('''C''') spanned by Dirac matrices <math>\,\gamma_i\!</math> such that | |||
<center><math>\, \gamma_i\gamma_j+\gamma_j\gamma_i=2\eta_{ij}\!</math></center> | |||
being <math>\, \eta_{ij}\!</math> the matrix of a quadratic form with signature (p,q), Dirac operator is given by | |||
<center><math>\, D=i\eta_{ij}\gamma_i\partial_j. \!</math></center> | |||
With a gauge connection <math>\,A\!</math>this becomes | |||
<center><math>\, D_A=i\eta_{ij}\gamma_i(\partial_j+iA_j). \!</math></center> | |||
==The Maxwell-Dirac equation== | ==The Maxwell-Dirac equation== | ||
Line 11: | Line 25: | ||
<center><math>\Box A + \nabla (\nabla_{x,t} A)= \underline{y} y </math></center> | <center><math>\Box A + \nabla (\nabla_{x,t} A)= \underline{y} y </math></center> | ||
where <math>y</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and <math>D</math> is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>A</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>. | where <math>\, y\!</math> is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and <math>\, D\!</math> is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put <math>y</math> in <math>H^{s_1}</math> and <math>A</math> in <math>H^{s_2} \times H^{s_2 - 1}</math>. | ||
* Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>. | * Scaling is <math>(s_1, s_2) = (n/2-3/2, n/2-1)</math>. |
Revision as of 07:27, 19 June 2009
This article describes several equations named after Paul Dirac.
Dirac operator
Given a Clifford algebra Cℓp,q(C) spanned by Dirac matrices such that
being the matrix of a quadratic form with signature (p,q), Dirac operator is given by
With a gauge connection this becomes
The Maxwell-Dirac equation
[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), and is the Dirac operator with connection A. We put in and in .
- Scaling is .
- When , there is GWP for small smooth data Chd1973
- When there is LWP for in the Coulomb gauge Bou1999, and for in the Lorenz gauge Bou1996
- For in the Coulomb gauge this is in Bou1996
- This has recently been improved by Selberg to . Note that for technical reasons, lower-regularity results do not automatically imply higher ones when the regularity of one field (e.g. ) is kept fixed.
- LWP for smooth data was obtained in Grs1966
- GWP for small smooth data was obtained in Ge1991
- When , GWP for small smooth data is known (Psarelli?)
In the nonrelativistic limit this equation converges to a Maxwell-Poisson system for data in the energy space BecMauSb-p2; furthermore one has a local well-posedness result which grows logarithmically in the asymptotic parameter. Earlier work appears in MasNa2003.
Dirac-Klein-Gordon equation
[More info on this equation would be greatly appreciated. - Ed.]
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field (solving a coupled massive Dirac equation), is the Dirac operator and is a scalar (real) field. We put in and in .
The energy class is essentially , but the energy density is not positive. However, the norm of is also positive and conserved..
- Scaling is .
- When there is GWP for Chd1973, Bou2000 and LWP for Bou2000.
- When there are some LWP results in Bou2001
Nonlinear Dirac equation
This equation essentially reads
where is a spinor field, is the mass, is a complex parameter, is the zeroth Pauli matrix, and is the spinor inner product.
- Scaling is (at least in the massless case ).
- In , LWP is known for when EscVe1997
- This can be improved to LWP in (and GWP for small data) if an epsilon of additional regularity as assumed in the radial variable MacNkrNaOz-p; in particular one has GWP for radial data.
- In , GWP is known for small data when MacNaOz-p2. Some results on the nonrelativistic limit of this equation are also obtained in that paper.