Quartic NLS: Difference between revisions

From DispersiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Bib ref)
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
* Scaling is <math>s_c = -1/6\,</math>.
* Scaling is <math>s_c = -1/6\,</math>.
* For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]]
* For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> [[CaWe1990]]
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [KnPoVe-p] and defocusing [CtCoTa-p2] cases.
** Below <math>L^2\,</math> we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing [[KnPoVe-p]] and defocusing [[CtCoTa-p2]] cases.
* If the quartic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uuuu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -1/6\,.</math> For <math>|u|^4\,</math> one has LWP for <math>s > -1/8\,</math>, while for the other three types <math>u^4\,</math>, <math>u u u \underline{u}\,</math>, or <math>u \underline{uuu}\,</math> one has LWP for <math>s > -1/6\,</math> [[Gr-p2]].
* If the quartic non-linearity is of <math>\underline{uuuu}\,</math> type then one can obtain LWP for <math>s > -1/6\,.</math> For <math>|u|^4\,</math> one has LWP for <math>s > -1/8\,</math>, while for the other three types <math>u^4\,</math>, <math>u u u \underline{u}\,</math>, or <math>u \underline{uuu}\,</math> one has LWP for <math>s > -1/6\,</math> [[Gr-p2]].
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u|^3 u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u|^3 u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 0\,</math> by <math>L^2\,</math> conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.
Line 17: Line 17:
* Scaling is <math>s_c = 1/3\,.</math>
* Scaling is <math>s_c = 1/3\,.</math>
* For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge s_c\,</math> [[CaWe1990]].
* For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for <math>s \ge s_c\,</math> [[CaWe1990]].
** For <math>s<s_c\,</math> we have ill-posedness, indeed the <math>H^s\,</math> norm can get arbitrarily large arbitrarily quickly [CtCoTa-p2]. In the focusing case we have instantaneous blowup from the virial identity and scaling.
** For <math>s<s_c\,</math> we have ill-posedness, indeed the <math>H^s\,</math> norm can get arbitrarily large arbitrarily quickly [[CtCoTa-p2]]. In the focusing case we have instantaneous blowup from the [[virial identity]] and scaling.
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u|^3 u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 1\,</math> [[Ka1986]].
* In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type <math>|u|^3 u\,</math>) we have GWP for <math>s \ge 1\,</math> [[Ka1986]].
** This has been improved to <math>s > 1-e\,</math> in [[CoKeStTkTa2003c]] in the defocusing Hamiltonian case. This result can of course be improved further.
** This has been improved to <math>s > 1-e\,</math> in [[CoKeStTkTa2003c]] in the defocusing Hamiltonian case. This result can of course be improved further.

Latest revision as of 06:25, 21 July 2007

Quartic NLS on

  • Scaling is .
  • For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990
    • Below we have ill-posedness by Gallilean invariance considerations in both the focusing KnPoVe-p and defocusing CtCoTa-p2 cases.
  • If the quartic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for For one has LWP for , while for the other three types , , or one has LWP for Gr-p2.
  • In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for by conservation. In the other cases it is not clear whether there is any reasonable GWP result, except possibly for very small data.

Quartic NLS on

  • For any quartic non-linearity one has LWP for Bo1993.
  • If the quartic non-linearity is of type then one can obtain LWP for , Gr-p2.
  • If the nonlinearity is of type one has GWP for random data whose Fourier coefficients decay like (times a Gaussian random variable) Bo1995c. Indeed one has an invariant measure.

Quartic NLS on

  • Scaling is
  • For any quartic non-linearity one can obtain LWP for CaWe1990.
    • For we have ill-posedness, indeed the norm can get arbitrarily large arbitrarily quickly CtCoTa-p2. In the focusing case we have instantaneous blowup from the virial identity and scaling.
  • In the Hamiltonian case (a non-linearity of type ) we have GWP for Ka1986.
    • This has been improved to in CoKeStTkTa2003c in the defocusing Hamiltonian case. This result can of course be improved further.
    • Scattering in the energy space Na1999c in the defocusing Hamiltonian case.
    • One also has GWP and scattering for small data for any quintic non-linearity.